-
HMMMMM and where exactly is this "right" in the constitution?
So you have no problem with your wardrobe being regulated by the government? :confused: don't get me wrong, that look is moronic but if they pass laws saying you cannot wear baggy pants, whats next?
-
So you have no problem with your wardrobe being regulated by the government? :confused: don't get me wrong, that look is moronic but if they pass laws saying you cannot wear baggy pants, whats next?
Exactly, this law is pressing our freedoms on what we can wear.
-
what if you don't wear underwear ?
Although i really don't like that look . It is kind of against our admendments !
I mean if we can bear arms why not a little ass ? and think of all the thongs that will be covered up ?
Lucky hit it dead on about the underwear!!!
Lol well if ya'll havent seen it in this particular town then you dont know whats going on! alot of the reason they wanted it stoped is some of these moron kids are running around with the pants so low their bizzness is showing:rolleyes: so yea i can see it being the right law at the right time.
-
HMMMMM and where exactly is this "right" in the constitution?
That would be in the very first sentence of it:
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
-
So you have no problem with your wardrobe being regulated by the government? :confused: don't get me wrong, that look is moronic but if they pass laws saying you cannot wear baggy pants, whats next?
Maybe next they won't allow women to wear their T-shirts with the nipples cut out?:eek: :D
Where does it say in the constitution that we have to wear clothes at all?
Society has every "right" to regulate what is civil behavior.:rolleyes:
-
That would be in the very first sentence of it:
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
So you're saying he founding fathers penned that statement to insure scumbags can parade around with their asses hanging out?
So why do I have to wear clothes? Why can't I expose myself in public.:rolleyes: :D
-
So you're saying he founding fathers penned that statement to insure scumbags can parade around with their asses hanging out?
So why do I have to wear clothes? Why can't I expose myself in public.:rolleyes: :D
That same sentence says it all.
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
If the kids privates are showing, there (most likely) is already a law against that in their town.
If you're insinuating that the govt has the right to regulate clothing that hangs too low...well, I really doubt that the founding fathers had that in mind, just the opposite I would imagine.
-
It seems to be a very LOOSE;) interpretation of the indecency laws. I hate that look, but this does not seem like it is something that could hold up to a court challenge, as it is very vague and subjective.
-
There is always an up side...I bet they cant run fast in them ...when the cops are chasing them....:D
-
That same sentence says it all.
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
If the kids privates are showing, there (most likely) is already a law against that in their town.
If you're insinuating that the govt has the right to regulate clothing that hangs too low...well, I really doubt that the founding fathers had that in mind, just the opposite I would imagine.
So a law aginst nudity is fine with you but a law against saggin is not?
What if it's not ok with everyone else?
Society has every right to interpret and regulate what is decent or indecent. Doesn't it?