The reason I was wondering is I'm looking at making a change the opposite of what you are doing. I want a thinner shoe(going from 1/2" to 3/8"). While I could simply mill mine down to the required thickness, I also want the entry ramp to more closely match the entry of the intake, which means moving it back about 3/16"-1/4". This means a lot of extra work that, to me, justifies just making a new shoe. If only we knew someone who could do that very time consuming part of the process with a CAD/CAM program and a CNC machine......
I kinda did something like that already. I made a rideplate that also incorporated the shoe into it. It measured .200 thick and no cutback. That put the biting edge at nearly the same position as the cutback shoe.
http://www.***boat.com/image_center/...eplateshoe.jpg
W/ my normal setup, the boat gets on plane, accellerates, porpoises a little and then flattens out(no porpoise) to top speed.
When I tryed the one piece shoe/rideplate, everything "early" was the same but it would not stop porpoising = N.G.! That ended that experiment. :boxed:
I am by no means discouraging you to try this, only this is what happened to me w/ my hull.