It's common sense to not pollute. It's not common sense to blindly follow unproven theories into economic and social oblivion.
Your unwavering faith of what "must" be and stubborness to be influenced otherwise or even consider GW theory may be tainted, are amazing. You stereotype anyone not in agreement with your personal beliefs with all the monikers typically thrown about by the liberal left and then complain about the division between parties and the populace.
Your frustration with Smokin' is almost comical from the standpoint of how you discount all of what he throws at you as wrong, yet turn back around and refuse to offer any valid evidence other than personal opinion why he is wrong. And the personal opinion is based almost completely on "because THEY said so". Blind faith is very dangerous.
Please don't assume those disagreeing with your opinions don't care about the environment and don't assume those that disagree with you are blindly following any leader or philosophy. Those of opposing view just often times question the amazing amount of "social consciousness", "flavor of the day" issues that come to dominate our every waking moment. If you aren't careful they often cover up the real issues.
Tex,
Smokin is well aware of scientific evendence that contrdicts much of the evidence he represents in this regard. Smokinevidencecontradicts has stated that we arer 20 years from knowing the truth. "it's a mtter of opinion For the moment, yes, and in less than 2 decades, it will be a matter of scientific fact I believe." He can post all of the eveidence that he liikes, and as I said, he and I are both aware that are that I can post evidence to the contary. A pissing contest which I have no time or desire to engage in
You can view my thoughts or posts as comical if you would like. It should be clear that my intent is to advocate the reductioin of the production of exhaust. I'm surely not alone in my belief that exhaust is harmfull to te envirement. The global warming movement advocates positive enviomental changes. Eliminating or reducing our dependence on forien oil. Further development of renewable enegy sources and many other postive changes. I haven't heard of any other movement from the right that addresses these issues. The vast majority of those in this forum do everything to discount and disprove any view that any left or lib involvement. Enviomentalists are referred to as lib tree huggers. This surely doesn't suggest enviormental concern, now does it.
You all have no problem suggesting that I'm a idiot, lying lib fool, or as you put is, comical in my response to Smokin.
I asked the following questions and for some reason find nothing comical about them.
If the American people treat this issue as if it doesn't exist, little more will be done to reduce the production of emissions. If this belief proven to be invalid, further damage will have been done?
If the American people treat this issue as if it does exist, substantially more will be done to reduce the production of emissions. If this belief proven to be invalid, what damage will have been done?
BTW opinions on GW are very partisin. If the right is so conerned about the enviorment, as you have so indicated, please explain to all of us blind followers, what's they're doing to improve things.