**** justice, **** the american people

[Old Texan]

Tex,
You must admit that Bush and his administration provide plenty of targets for taking shots. As you know, I am looking forward to a change in 09. But is sucks that, as of now, we don't have much to choose from on either side.
Change party and all you do is change flavors. We will most likely have to resign ourselves to the facts of both parties offering different versions of the power machines they've built.
As much as you dislike the present administration it's hard to fathom how you can hope the other side has anything to improve with? The socialist leanings of H.Clinton and her ongoing tirades based on what the polls say each day prior to her latest spiel, is quite disconcerting to me. I plain don't trust her and felt the same about her hubby. Bill was tolerable from the point of his personality but his "machine" presents just as many targets as the current admin.
To me the scariest trend in government is the 60's radicals in the form of Pelosi, Boxer, and friends that have no concept whatsoever of reality or morality. They care only about their livfelong agendas of euphoria and in no way are capbable of making life deicisons for the best benefit of this country.
Bottom line is the terrorists might do this country a favor if they blew up the Capitol when both House and Senate were in full session and the Pres was standing up front but they know doing this would be against their own interests so we're stuck with this bunch of fools. :devil:

[ULTRA26 # 1]

Change party and all you do is change flavors. We will most likely have to resign ourselves to the facts of both parties offering different versions of the power machines they've built.
As much as you dislike the present administration it's hard to fathom how you can hope the other side has anything to improve with? The socialist leanings of H.Clinton and her ongoing tirades based on what the polls say each day prior to her latest spiel, is quite disconcerting to me. I plain don't trust her and felt the same about her hubby. Bill was tolerable from the point of his personality but his "machine" presents just as many targets as the current admin.
To me the scariest trend in government is the 60's radicals in the form of Pelosi, Boxer, and friends that have no concept whatsoever of reality or morality. They care only about their livfelong agendas of euphoria and in no way are capbable of making life deicisons for the best benefit of this country.
Bottom line is the terrorists might do this country a favor if they blew up the Capitol when both House and Senate were in full session and the Pres was standing up front but they know doing this would be against their own interests so we're stuck with this bunch of fools. :devil:
Tex,
I understand exactly where you are coming from and agree with most of what you commented, however I believe that anyone running on either side, with the exception of Hillary, is capible of doing a better job than what we currently have. If Ron Pauls had a bit more stature, and was slightly less eccentric, I believe he could do a good job. Sad to say that the Mr Paul's low points will never change.

[SmokinLowriderSS]

Apparently you can't read. "No facts no source" was clearly stated in my post but of course in your world people can't have feelings that aren't supported by internet source material. .
I just wanted to give you every opportunity to re-open the can of worms I burried you with over the Plame investigation/non-crime.
I personally think it's interesting that you don't cry over Richard Armitage's lack of prison time while you sure want to hang Dick Cheney.
Again, feelings that have no basis in reality. Quite entertaining.
It's a shame that you aren't nearly as intelligent as you would like everyone to believe.
I'm not the one who WAS WRONG in a 3-page urinating contest over pluralizing a word, am I smart guy?
How about some more diatribes eh? :idea:
However, I believe that in time we will all learn how crooked Dicky boy really is and was.
So, how many decades will it take to earn a retraction if you turn out to be wrong?
Of course, a complete lack of evidence is certainly not proof that it didn't happen (the core of all nutball conspiracies).
It's a good thing your gut knows what goes on better than the FBI did in rooting out Armitage. Maybe you missed your calling in selling insurance. Go FBI and clean it all up. :idea:

[ULTRA26 # 1]

I just wanted to give you every opportunity to re-open the can of worms I burried you with over the Plame investigation/non-crime.
I personally think it's interesting that you don't cry over Richard Armitage's lack of prison time while you sure want to hang Dick Cheney.
Again, feelings that have no basis in reality. Quite entertaining.
I'm not the one who WAS WRONG in a 3-page urinating contest over pluralizing a word, am I smart guy?
How about some more diatribes eh? :idea:
So, how many decades will it take to earn a retraction if you turn out to be wrong?
Of course, a complete lack of evidence is certainly not proof that it didn't happen (the core of all nutball conspiracies).
It's a good thing your gut knows what goes on better than the FBI did in rooting out Armitage. Maybe you missed your calling in selling insurance. Go FBI and clean it all up. :idea:
You buried me? That's funny. I don't think I've ever run across someone as full of himself as you are Smokin. It's becoming harder, with every Smokin post to take you seriously.
Diatribing??? Right on oh smart one Get you foot out of your mouth and maybe we can communicate. I suspect you can't