Rex,
You are talking about an army of men that did not want to be there, that did not want to fight and were extremely happy when we showed up and immediately surrendered. Rules of engagement were definetly planned, we dropped leaflets and aired warnings for people to stay in their homes, anyone on the street would be shot and killed. The problem we faced immediatly was the lack of security on the borders and soon enough iraq became a terrorist playground. We did obliterate the enemy we set out too but seem to drag our feet with the one that we fight today. Just not enough manpower to keep borders completely secure. I definetly agree with you on our borders!
I see your point. Seems like very poor planning on the Iraq border subject though. The government and the military had to recognize in advance that it would be a big problem, one would think, based on the attitude and terriorist content of Iraq's neighbors. My question in hindsight is why our government would allow us to go in knowing that this infiltration over Iraq's borders issue would result in what we have today. Either they were just dumbasses or it had to be planned this way it would seem.
With the billions of dollars we've spent over 4 years I'm confident the technology exists to have secured those borders with night vishion and / or infrared heat sensing technology / satalite / backed up with air support probably for far less money than has been spent.
Again maybe the goal of the war was to draw the terrorists to Iraq so we could fight them all there in one place rather than here or other places. It's all I can think of that makes any sense at this point.