Reply With Quoteso what you are saying is if you replace parts on a motor with older parts the age of the motor will increase?
not if he has papers saying it was sold to him as a 94
If the motor is truly a 1988, and I sold it as an 94 BOS or no BOS, I would want to try and defend it.
The motor number will tell it's true age.
so what you are saying is if you replace parts on a motor with older parts the age of the motor will increase?
Regardless of what SWB says, tell this guy to go fock himself. Tell him that you are well aware of the law and what goes into a lawsuit. That is, both of you will have to retain counsel and pay a retainer. Probably to the tune of 2K or so. Ask him if he is willing to do so. If so, then tell him that you are willing as well. Tell him you will retain counsel and get all your witnesses aligned. Fact witnesses, percipient witnesses (eye witness) and experts will be called and deposed prior to trial. All of this will cost a ton of money.
Fock this guy and his big balls unless you screwed him of course.
There's one in every crowd
Sleeper CP
There's one in every crowd
Sleeper CP
One what?
so what you are saying is if you replace parts on a motor with older parts the age of the motor will increase?
Try and make some sense of of this comment for the rest of us.
An SEC fan.
That is what I thought he meant.
so how do you determine how old something is?
the parts that dont move or the parts that do move...
the "engine", trim unit and "lower" are 94 the mid section is a 88
what year is the motor?
[QUOTE=gotboostedvr6;2890987]so how do you determine how old something is?
QUOTE]
I thought that is why there are serial numbers.
also how often do outboards have all the parts match each other in age and total run time?
Is the power head a 94 and the lower unit is a 88 ? if you said the motor is a 1994 then you where not being deceptive. I'd argue that he wants his money back because he doesn't know how to install the engine. Did you say in writing sold as is?
Posting Permissions
