PDA

View Full Version : Be careful what you ask for



28Prowler525
06-29-2005, 01:57 PM
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A California man, angry over a U.S. Supreme Court decision expanding government power to take private property, says he will try to use the ruling to seize the New Hampshire home of Justice David Souter and convert it into a hotel to be named the Lost Liberty Hotel.
Souter voted with the 5-4 majority last week when the Supreme Court ruled a Connecticut city could use its powers of eminent domain to take private homes to make way for a riverfront hotel, health club and offices.
The justices said the project served a public purpose of revitalizing a depressed local economy, but critics have called the ruling an unprecedented expansion of the powers of government to seize private property in America.
"This is a serious project and if we get enough money from investors we will proceed with it," said Logan Darrow Clements, who runs a California video production company called Freestar Media that he said is dedicated to exposing abuses of power.
"It's solely for the purpose of showing (Souter) that his decision was unjust," he said. "We hope to make a profit as well but I don't agree with eminent domain so the irony is that we are going to use eminent domain against him."
Clements said he had contacted officials in Weare, New Hampshire, for an application to build a hotel on the property where the Supreme Court justice's home now stands, arguing that a hotel would increase tax revenue and provide an economic boost.
He said the hotel would be called the Lost Liberty Hotel and would include a restaurant called the Just Desserts Cafe and a museum with a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America.
He said instead of a Gideon's Bible, each room would include a copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged," which many people embrace as a treatise on liberty and self-determination.
"This is not a prank," he said. "The town of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land (from Justice Souter) we can begin our hotel development."
The Supreme Court had no comment on Clements' plan and the Weare Board of Selectmen could not immediately be reached for comment.

HCS
06-29-2005, 02:02 PM
I hope it works!

Jordy
06-29-2005, 02:04 PM
That's great!!!! :D

Her454
06-29-2005, 02:07 PM
I'd send $$$$ if I knew it would make a difference! Good for him!

C-2
06-29-2005, 02:13 PM
I can't believe the media even entertains this clown. Why not say the Whitehouse - chances are about the same.
To each his own and at least he got a plug for his name and company. :)

Lake Ape
06-29-2005, 02:28 PM
I can't believe the media even entertains this clown. Why not say the Whitehouse - chances are about the same.
To each his own and at least he got a plug for his name and company. :)
I think he has a point that he his trying to prove. I am sure that the English also called George Washington a clown. Big Brother is continiously screwing us out of our rights in the name of progress, safety and "for the kids".
I doubt he thinks it will actually work, he's just trying to prove a point.
If more people would stand up to the government we wouldn't have as many problems as we do.
that's it for my http://battellemedia.com/images/1870_two_cents_rev.jpg

C-2
06-29-2005, 02:41 PM
I doubt he thinks it will actually work, he's just trying to prove a point.
You think?
Clowns like this take away from folks facing the very real matter at hand.
But hey, it's a free country and my opinion is no more valuable than yours. ;)

HCS
06-29-2005, 03:35 PM
Another thing that gets me is that, those old bastards are making decisions about file sharing and the internet. The old farts probably still have rotory phones in their houses. I dought they even no what a freaking computer is.

totenhosen
06-29-2005, 03:39 PM
You think?
Clowns like this take away from folks facing the very real matter at hand.
But hey, it's a free country and my opinion is no more valuable than yours. ;)
I think he standing up for those people actually facing it and saying "see why this ruling is bs, here is what can happen"

MagicMtnDan
06-29-2005, 04:26 PM
This is the best news I've heard since the Supreme Court decided to give the ultimate control over OUR property to the morons in local government. Property rights should be sacred.
If you don't care then you should be happy if/when you have to give up your house/land. If you do care then you should pay attention to the next Supreme Court nominees and watch the Democrats fight tooth and nail to keep Bush from putting more conservatives on the bench.
Keep in mind that it's the lefties (Democratic Supreme Court appointees) that were in favor of allowing local goverments gain control over our property. Something about the liberal judges who aren't really liberal in terms of property rights.
This is a very big deal!