C-2
08-23-2006, 12:39 PM
I saw an interesting article in the paper today. The substance of the article was about a dirtbag in Eastvale who was convicted of stealing an SUV with a child in it.
I remember this Amber Alert and hereÂ’s the part which caught my attention:
“The case brought regional attention when, during the first theft, Riverside County Sheriff’s deputies searched for the child for almost two hours. A cell phone belonging to the family was in the car but the cell phone company, Sprint, refused to provide the vehicle’s whereabouts, citing privacy concerns.”
WTF?
Get used to crap like this. The more everybody pushes privacy issues – the more it will affect our lives in everyday situations.
For example, I recently went to Circuit City to buy a TV and decided to open a new account. Thinking I would save some time, I did it in advance, over the phone. The Indian clerk (as in outsourced customer service rep in India) started asking me about several addresses; one address is in NC where IÂ’ve never been; one is a piece of vacant land we own, and the third is a past business address. I answered truthfully and said no, IÂ’ve never lived at any of those addresses (I even explained what two of them were).
So the clerk said SORRY, you did not pass our security screening so your application will be denied (without even looking at my credit/FICO). I freaked and asked to speak with a supervisor, who asked more questions and approved the application, but limited it to $1K over “identity concerns.”
Several years ago I placed a security flag on my credit reports - the one which requires additional scrutiny by credit grantors. I thought I was doing the right thing by having it on there, but as it turns out, it can actually hurt your ability to open new credit lines. Not only do you run the risk of failing your own security screening – but credit limits are also lower for security flagged credit reports, and some creditors will not approve online account applications.
I had the security flag removed.
WeÂ’re all doomedÂ…Â… :220v:
I remember this Amber Alert and hereÂ’s the part which caught my attention:
“The case brought regional attention when, during the first theft, Riverside County Sheriff’s deputies searched for the child for almost two hours. A cell phone belonging to the family was in the car but the cell phone company, Sprint, refused to provide the vehicle’s whereabouts, citing privacy concerns.”
WTF?
Get used to crap like this. The more everybody pushes privacy issues – the more it will affect our lives in everyday situations.
For example, I recently went to Circuit City to buy a TV and decided to open a new account. Thinking I would save some time, I did it in advance, over the phone. The Indian clerk (as in outsourced customer service rep in India) started asking me about several addresses; one address is in NC where IÂ’ve never been; one is a piece of vacant land we own, and the third is a past business address. I answered truthfully and said no, IÂ’ve never lived at any of those addresses (I even explained what two of them were).
So the clerk said SORRY, you did not pass our security screening so your application will be denied (without even looking at my credit/FICO). I freaked and asked to speak with a supervisor, who asked more questions and approved the application, but limited it to $1K over “identity concerns.”
Several years ago I placed a security flag on my credit reports - the one which requires additional scrutiny by credit grantors. I thought I was doing the right thing by having it on there, but as it turns out, it can actually hurt your ability to open new credit lines. Not only do you run the risk of failing your own security screening – but credit limits are also lower for security flagged credit reports, and some creditors will not approve online account applications.
I had the security flag removed.
WeÂ’re all doomedÂ…Â… :220v: