PDA

View Full Version : USC Fans-BCS Selection



THOR
12-02-2007, 05:16 PM
Rose Bowl just announced
USC s Illinois
What an absolute a$$ kicking this will be. How can the BCS mess up so badly.

Havasu_Dreamin
12-02-2007, 05:19 PM
Well, at least the PAC-10 will win the Rose Bowl again...

3 daytona`s
12-02-2007, 05:20 PM
Rose Bowl just announced
USC s Illinois
What an absolute a$$ kicking this will be. How can the BCS mess up so badly.
When is enough is enough:idea:

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 05:22 PM
Rose Bowl just announced
USC s Illinois
What an absolute a$$ kicking this will be. How can the BCS mess up so badly.
I think since OSU is going to the BCS game. 2nd place Illinois was next up.

Panic Button
12-02-2007, 05:25 PM
USC can't play any real teams? Love to see them play a SEC team during the regular season.

Bullmoose
12-02-2007, 05:35 PM
So who's playing for the championship?

THOR
12-02-2007, 05:49 PM
USC can't play any real teams? Love to see them play a SEC team during the regular season.
You couldnt survive in the SEC, period. You would either get hurt and too banged up to finish.

THOR
12-02-2007, 05:50 PM
You mean like Arkansas or Auburn, who they've dismantled like 150-20 in the three games they've played them in the last three years?
I'm sorry, 143-31, or 167-48 if you count the last two times versus Arkansas and the last two times versus Auburn.
Dont make me pull out stats to embarass you again Bob. ;)
You just dont want any part of the playing a full year in the SEC. You wouldnt make it out alive.

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 05:58 PM
Dont make me pull out stats to embarass you again Bob. ;)
You just dont want any part of the playing a full year in the SEC. You wouldnt make it out alive.
I quess the BCS has gotten it wrong the last 6 straight years. :confused: Dumb fockers. :eek: :D

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:00 PM
I quess the BCS has gotten it wrong the last 6 straight years. :confused: Dumb fockers. :eek: :D
No doubt. Think of how good Georgia/USC or LSU/USC, or Ok/LSU, etc. All those would have been great.

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 06:07 PM
No doubt. Think of how good Georgia/USC or LSU/USC, or Ok/LSU, etc. All those would have been great.
I was refering to USC 6 straight BCS bowl games. :rolleyes:

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:09 PM
I was refering to USC 6 straight BCS bowl games. :rolleyes:
Well, seeing as how you only won one in a row and shared one, then 6 in a row would be impossible no matter how you slice it up. :rolleyes:

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 06:11 PM
Well, seeing as how you only won one in a row and shared one, then 6 in a row would be impossible no matter how you slice it up. :rolleyes:
6 BCS bowl games. Not 6 BCS National Championship games. ;)

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:11 PM
BCS bowl games. Not BCS National Championship games. ;)
Oh :D

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 06:13 PM
Oh :D
We also play Ohio State in the preseason the next couple of years.

essexjet
12-02-2007, 06:20 PM
Glad to see SC in the BCS, not the bowl we hoped for.
Looking forward to Hawaii and the Bulldogs

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:20 PM
I gave you the total score for the last four meetings between the SEC and USC. Go ahead and spin it out of control now.
You know, 2 loss LSU didn't really make it out alive, now did they?
wont spin anything out of control Bob, but why dont you go back a few years and get stats. Better yet, justify why you got screwed again. Even best, justify why you think you still play in the best conference since you are the only person that thinks that is actually correct while being sober.

BadKachina
12-02-2007, 06:28 PM
SEC vs Pac 10 football, all-time, head-to-head record – (does not include 07 season)
The SEC leads the Pac-10 59-36-5 (.615).
Bowl records.
Bowls Wins Losses Ties Win %
SEC 352 177 162 13 .522
Big 12 304 144 157 4 .480
ACC 268 141 122 5 .536
Big Ten 226 111 112 3 .498
Pac-10 214 108 100 6 .519
Big East 100 46 52 2 .470

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:33 PM
Alright Bob, you asked for it. BTW, how many sports did you actually get cut from in HS to make you this bitter.
Until somebody proves them otherwise there is really nothing to talk about.
The SEC leads the Big Ten with a 63-45-2 all-time record.
The SEC has a .582 winning percentage versus the Big Ten.
The SEC leads the Big 12 in all-time head-to-head match-ups with an 17-15-0 (.531) record. Against the Big 12's predecessor (the Big Eight) the SEC had a 43-43-6 (.500) record.
So, what is the SEC vs ACC football all-time, head-to-head, football record? Here you go (updated through the 2006 season):
The SEC holds an 245-114-10 (.678) all-time advantage.
For now, the current all-time, head-to-head, SEC vs Big East football record is shows the Big East with a 17-13 (.567) advantage.
The SEC leads the Pac-10 59-36-5 (.615).
Once upon a time, in a land far, far away, Ivy League Football was the best.... Oh sorry, I was off daydreaming again.
13-12-0 (.520) in favor of the Ivy League. Most of these happened at the beginning of the 20th century.
Bowls Wins Losses Ties Win %
SEC 352 177 162 13 .522
Big 12 304 144 157 4 .480
ACC 268 141 122 5 .536
Big Ten 226 111 112 3 .498
Pac-10 214 108 100 6 .519
Big East 100 46 52 2 .470
OK, let's give Michigan fans their due. The Wolverines have been playing football longer than anyone (126 years) and they have the most all-time wins (849) and highest winning percentage (.744). But, there are only two other Big Ten teams in the Top-25 (Ohio State and Penn State).
The SEC has six teams in the top-25 all-time; 10 in the Top 50 and all 12 (South Carolina and Mississippi State the bottom 2) in the Top-75 All-Time College Football Victories. It is this depth that gives the SEC the most wins and makes it the Top All-Time College Football Conference Record conference.
If you really want to go further, we can take it back to where it all starts, High School.Top 10 up until 2004.
WINS All-Time
821 Valdosta, GA (1913-2004, 821-174-34)
754 Massillon Washington, OH
(1894-2004, 754-220-35)
750 Louisville Male, KY
(1893-2004, 750-287-49)
750 Little Rock Central, AR
(1907-2004, 750-277-48)
743 Mount Carmel, PA
(1893-2004, 743-265-57)
739 Fort Thomas Highlands, KY
(1915-2004, 739-213-26)
727 Canton McKinley, OH
(1894-2004, 727-303-42)
713 Parkersburg, WV
(1906-2004, 713-264-33)
710 Mayfield, KY
(1919-2004, 710-228-32)
699 Easton, PA
(1894-2004, 699-303-54)
ALL-TIME STATE CHAMPIONSHIPS All-Time
35 Sioux Falls Washington, SD (1905-76)
32 Little Rock Central, AR (1907-04)
27 Lawrence, KS (1945-95)
26 Butte, MT (1900-91)
25 Phoenix Union, AZ (1913-55)
24 Artesia, NM (1957-04)
23 Valdosta, GA (1940-98)
23 Massillon Washington, OH (1909-03)
23 Everett, MA (1896-2004)
21 Pine Bluff, AR (1915-95)
Cry over that Bob.
The way I see it is that ASU, USC and Stanford are the best of the west. ASU has the record, USC beat ASU and Stanford beat USC so that makes Stanford the best of the PAC 10. That is one solid conference Bob.
What about scoreboard Bob? You are just bitter.

BadKachina
12-02-2007, 06:33 PM
I went back to as far as Pete Carroll has been coach. 167-48 versus Arkansas and Auburn since 2001. Scoreboard bitches.
LMAO.....:D

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 06:33 PM
SEC vs Pac 10 football, all-time, head-to-head record – (does not include 07 season)
The SEC leads the Pac-10 59-36-5 (.615).
Bowl records.
Bowls Wins Losses Ties Win %
SEC 352 177 162 13 .522
Big 12 304 144 157 4 .480
ACC 268 141 122 5 .536
Big Ten 226 111 112 3 .498
Pac-10 214 108 100 6 .519
Big East 100 46 52 2 .470
What about the Pac 8 stats. ? Before we let those weak Arizona teams in the conference. :eek: :D

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:35 PM
The statement was that USC wouldn't make it in the SEC. From their limited exposure, I would beg to differ. It's not like USC struggled to a 3OT win, 167-48. Scoreboard.
Way to spin it around Bob. I can actually see you backpeddling from my house. :rolleyes:

mbrown2
12-02-2007, 06:37 PM
Been working in the back all day and this is 1st place I have read anything on the BCS..., I think Kansas got jobbed....can't believe they would send overrated LSU there...who have they really beat given the conference is overrated......I was only hoping to send an SEC team to the Rose Bowl...what a focking joke......The (B)ig (C)ock (S)uckers would have sent LSU even if they would have lost yesterday...

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:39 PM
Cal beat Tennessee and Tennessee played in the SEC Championship. So, I guess that makes Cal at least the second best team in the SEC.
167-48 SCOREBOARD.
Scoreboard
Bowls Wins Losses Ties Win %
SEC 352 177 162 13 .522
Big 12 304 144 157 4 .480
ACC 268 141 122 5 .536
Big Ten 226 111 112 3 .498
Pac-10 214 108 100 6 .519
Big East 100 46 52 2 .470
Breakdown the Pete Carrol deal again Bob. Limit it to only 3 quarter touchdown with a relative humidity of 30%. Jeeze you are reaching. Just realize you are second best and this will all be over.
Bring out your UCLA stats for the 90's since you were a fan of them in that era. Better yet, bring out the Stanford stats when Elway was there, BC stats when Flutie was there, and Florida stats when Emmet was there. Those are still filed in your bandwagon somewhere.

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:40 PM
This is specifically the post I was responding to. Not any of your posts. He would "love to see them play a SEC Team during the regular season." Me too. 167-48. SCOREBOARD.
You cant even beat Stanford. That alone should get you busted to 1-AA.

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:41 PM
Also, should we remind everybody how LSU barely beat Ariz St 35-31 (2005?) with two blocked kicks late or a really bad Oregon State team 22-21 (2004) when Oregon State missed 3 extra points in the same game.
2-0.
Scoreboard. LMAO

BadKachina
12-02-2007, 06:42 PM
Also, should we remind everybody how LSU barely beat Ariz St 35-31 (2005?) .
Their city was under water at the time.:idea: :)

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:43 PM
167-48 over Auburn and Arkansas from 2001-2006, including a 23-0 shutout of Auburn. SCOREBOARD.
What else to you have Bob. Just recent bandwagon events or something meaningful. You keep repeating yourself. Or are those the voices in your head? At least I went to a school to take some pride in. Where did you go?

BadKachina
12-02-2007, 06:47 PM
As they say at the University of Tennessee: 2 Nobel laureates, 7 Rhodes scholars, 6 Pulitizer Prizes, 10 Astronauts. We also play a little football.;)

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:49 PM
The kids are only in school for two or three years. How many years should we go back, 100? How about we do Heisman trophy winners from USC next? National Championships all time. NFL draft picks. How about we do Heisman trophy winners from LSU ALL TIME versus USC in the last 10 years?
I just posted the facts. What else do you want? I have the facts of all time and havent diced them up like you do. You only use the facts to try to illustrate how good the second best Pac 10 really is. Face is bro, you are second, period. Just win the Rose bowl and be happy with that. Enough said. Do you really want everyone to come on here and say how cool you are or how good SC is? BTW, where the hell have been the last few weeks when SC hasnt been playing well? Funny how you are there for the tough times but gloat tof the good times. I think people call you a bandwagoner or a fair weahtered fan. I might be mistaken though.

BadKachina
12-02-2007, 06:49 PM
It was at ASU. Sam Keller picked them apart like they were a Pop Warner team.
I watched it too, LSU however was mess and so was their city. I'm surprised they didn't cancel the game.

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:50 PM
As they say at the University of Tennessee: 2 Nobel laureates, 7 Rhodes scholars, 6 Pulitizer Prizes, 10 Astronauts. We also play a little football.;)
Classic.

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:54 PM
[QUOTE=ShockwaveBob;2923311]The SEC conference standing, all time, are a joke too, QUOTE]
Of course they are a joke Bob, because they dont illustrate how good you think you are. Only stats that say the PAC10 is the best are relevant right? You are a piece of work brother.
All time means all time. How do you rank?

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:54 PM
The SEC conference standing, all time, are a joke too, BTW. They play some of the weakest sister teams in the history of college football. LSU played, this season alone, Tulane, Middle Tenn St and La Tech. Come on, give us a break with your conference records.
You played Idaho and Stanford. 1-1 on top of that. Fantastic Bob, fantastic. :rolleyes:

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:56 PM
I've got an all time stat for you. 2nd best = Pac 10. SCOREBOARD.
:D :D :D

THOR
12-02-2007, 06:57 PM
I've got an all time stat for you. 167-48. SCOREBOARD.
My 4 year old wants to know if you are going to pull out the "nanny, nanny, billygoat" one next.

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 06:58 PM
You played Idaho and Stanford. 1-1 on top of that. Fantastic Bob, fantastic. :rolleyes:
First of all his real name is Jon. And for you being from Huntington Beach do you have a chip on your shoulder because you couldn't get into USC and had to go to Auburn. :eek: :D

THOR
12-02-2007, 07:01 PM
First of all his real name is Jon. And for you being from Huntington Beach do you have a chip on your shoulder because you couldn't get into USC and had to go to Auburn. :eek: :D
I got full rides to Auburn, Texas A&M, ASU, and USC for your info. Bob talks to Jon and they both fight with each other. :rolleyes:

3 daytona`s
12-02-2007, 07:01 PM
Well, seeing as how you only won one in a row and shared one, then 6 in a row would be impossible no matter how you slice it up. :rolleyes:
I was attempting eating and almost spitt a mouthful on the monitor:) One In A Row:D

THOR
12-02-2007, 07:01 PM
LSU lost to 7-5 Kentucky and 8-4 Arkansas. Isn't that the same Arkansas team that USC hung 120 points on in two games? Oh no, it's not, those Arkansas teams were better.
Nope, McFadden didnt play that game. Next.

THOR
12-02-2007, 07:02 PM
Here you go BobJon
For the second consecutive season, the University of Miami has the most players on NFL Kickoff rosters, the NFL announced today. This year, Miami has 46 players on NFL rosters, up from last season's total of 42. A total of 252 colleges were represented on Kickoff 2007 Weekend rosters. The following list contains the top 10 colleges with the most players in the NFL:
COLLEGE PLAYERS COLLEGE PLAYERS
Ohio State 44 Louisiana State 32
Florida State 41 Texas 32
Georgia 37 Florida 31
Michigan 36 Auburn 30
Tennessee 36 Notre Dame 30
The following is a breakdown by position of colleges with the most players on 2007 NFL rosters:
POSITION SCHOOL PLAYERS
Center Louisiana State, Texas A&M 4
Guard Boston College 4
Offensive tackle Florida State 5
Tight end Miami 5
Quarterback Fresno State, Michigan, Oregon, Southern California, Washington 3
Running back Auburn, Florida State, Miami 5
Wide receiver Ohio State 9
Defensive tackle Tennessee 8
Defensive end Georgia 7
Linebacker Miami, Michigan 9
Cornerback South Carolina, Texas 6
Safety Florida State 6
Punter Nebraska, Notre Dame 2
Kicker Louisiana Tech, Nebraska, Washington State 2

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 07:03 PM
I got full rides to Auburn, Texas A&M, ASU, and USC for your info. Bob talks to Jon and they both fight with each other. :rolleyes:
That would have been my pick. ;)

THOR
12-02-2007, 07:03 PM
I was attempting eating and almost spitt a mouthful on the monitor:) One In A Row:D
Stop laughing, this is serious. ;)

Havasu1986
12-02-2007, 07:05 PM
I was attempting eating and almost spitt a mouthful on the monitor:) One In A Row:D
You should keep reading before you post. :rolleyes:

3 daytona`s
12-02-2007, 07:05 PM
Stop laughing, this is serious. ;)
O.K.

Panic Button
12-02-2007, 07:26 PM
2005 Arkansas ranked #45...
Team Recognized titles Winning years
Notre Dame 13 1924, 1929, 1930, 1938, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1949, 1953, 1966, 1973, 1977, 1988
USC 11 1928, 1931, 1932, 1939, 1962, 1967, 1972, 1974, 1978, 2003, 2004
Alabama 11 1925, 1926, 1930, 1945, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1973, 1978, 1979, 1992
Oklahoma 9 1949, 1950, 1953, 1955, 1956, 1974, 1975, 1985, 2000
Ohio State 7 1942, 1944, 1954, 1957, 1961, 1968, 2002
Michigan 7 1901, 1902, 1932, 1933, 1947, 1948, 1997
Minnesota 6 1934, 1935, 1936, 1940, 1941, 1960
Nebraska 5 1970, 1971, 1994, 1995, 1997
Pittsburgh 5 1916, 1918, 1936, 1937, 1976
Miami 5 1983, 1987, 1989, 1991, 2001
Texas 4 1963, 1969, 1970, 2005
Tennessee 4 1938, 1950, 1951, 1998
Georgia Tech 4 1917, 1928, 1952, 1990
Harvard 4 1910, 1912, 1913, 1919
Or
AP Champion
Rank Team Total Last
1 Notre Dame 8 1988
2 Oklahoma 7 2000
3 Alabama 6 1992
4t USC 5 2004
4t Miami 5 2001
6t Ohio State 4 2002
6t Nebraska 4 1995
6t Minnesota 4 1960
9 Texas 3 2005
10t Florida 2 2006
10t Florida State 2 1999
10t Tennessee 2 1998
10t Michigan 2 1997
10t Penn State 2 1986
10t Pittsburgh 2 1976
10t Army 2 1945

XtrmWakeborder
12-02-2007, 07:43 PM
STFU with the damn SEC vs. Pac 10. Jesus, everybody has stats to make it look like "their" conference is better. I would have loved LSU or Georiga vs. USC. LSU should beat the crap out of Ohio state. And USC will probably get an OK challenge from Illinois.

XtrmWakeborder
12-02-2007, 08:08 PM
If ILL is within 3 TDs of USC, I would be shocked.
They beat Ohio st. and are a much better team then UCLA. USC only beat them by 17 points soo.. I like their QB.

mbrown2
12-02-2007, 08:26 PM
STFU with the damn SEC vs. Pac 10. Jesus, everybody has stats to make it look like "their" conference is better. I would have loved LSU or Georiga vs. USC. LSU should beat the crap out of Ohio state. And USC will probably get an OK challenge from Illinois.
Just the opposite...I think OSU beats OLSU and then USC beats Illinois.....who also happen to beat OSU.....BCS not only hangs from SEC nuts but they try to protect them from getting kicked by USC...

THOR
12-02-2007, 08:38 PM
USC didn't have a month to prepare for UCLA.
You will be able to witness, firsthand, the clinical definition of fast versus slow.
Yes you will; on Jan 7th when the speedy SEC rolls into town. The pac 10 is second best in speed to the SEC too. Second aint to bad BobJon. Just be happy with that.

THOR
12-02-2007, 08:46 PM
The guy that picks up the tee when USC kicks off could play WR at LSU.
Justify being second however you like BobJon, but you are. Furthermore, you lost to Stanford. That, in and of itself, is an asterisk on the entire program seeing as how the Cardinal were not even in the top 90 in the country.

3 daytona`s
12-02-2007, 08:50 PM
He's not that hard to entertain.
You lunitics= sit back and enjoy your stellar posts.:idea: Calm down BIG-BAD-BOB just attempting to defend myself.

3 daytona`s
12-02-2007, 09:05 PM
Can you really not just clown around EVER without thinking everybody is picking on you? It's getting a little old being the constant target of your whining.
Vice- Versa BOB:)

3 daytona`s
12-02-2007, 09:09 PM
Can you really not just clown around EVER without thinking everybody is picking on you? It's getting a little old being the constant target of your whining.
just trying to get to 2000 posts by the first of the year,way behind your post count,way behind your post count:idea: I do not think it is possible as? well you know;)

TrojanDan
12-02-2007, 09:10 PM
Damn, I just watched the BCS match up on Tivo. What crummy match-ups. :mad: Would have loved to have seen USC-Georgia/LSU matched up. What the hell were they thinking? :confused: Oh well, Pasadena here I come. :)

XtrmWakeborder
12-02-2007, 10:09 PM
The guy that picks up the tee when USC kicks off could play WR at LSU.
lmao! I expect USC to win, just not that easily. Mobile QBs have had good games against USC, and I like this juice guy. I seriously seriously doubt OSU will beat LSU.

mbrown2
12-02-2007, 10:25 PM
Yes you will; on Jan 7th when the speedy SEC rolls into town. The pac 10 is second best in speed to the SEC too. Second aint to bad BobJon. Just be happy with that.
You call us bandwagoneers...but you swing from from any SEC nut that still has a game left...cause you have no dog in any BCS fight..:)

THOR
12-03-2007, 07:49 AM
You call us bandwagoneers...but you swing from from any SEC nut that still has a game left...cause you have no dog in any BCS fight..:)
Better to swing than swallow Pete Carrols load like you all wish you could. ;)

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 08:00 AM
Better to swing than swallow ;)
At least you admit your gay...that's the 1st step...:)..pink tiger suits for everyone....BTW...Happy Monday! :)
Interesting how the SEC fairs so well in the BCS selection when their Commissioner is the BCS Coordinator...:idea:

SB
12-03-2007, 08:25 AM
Go Illini!:)

donzi5150
12-03-2007, 08:32 AM
This is specifically the post I was responding to. Not any of your posts. He would "love to see them play a SEC Team during the regular season." Me too. 167-48. SCOREBOARD.
Playing one team here and there in the schedule does not prove anything....it's the week end and weekout pounding these guys in the SEC get that make that possible......Do you remember when FSU and Bobby Bowden were shopping around for a new conference and it was narrowed to the ACC and the SEC? They went to the ACC becouse they did not want to take on the week in and week oput punishment of the SEC.....that stands tur even more today.......Look at all the SEC temas that were ranked throuout the year....some fell in and out but that shows that even on the outside the are very very competative, maybe not eite yet, but has the potential.......that is almost every SEC team except Ole Miss and Vandy.....:idea:

donzi5150
12-03-2007, 08:36 AM
The kids are only in school for two or three years. How many years should we go back, 100? How about we do Heisman trophy winners from USC next? National Championships all time. NFL draft picks. How about we do Heisman trophy winners from LSU ALL TIME versus USC in the last 10 years?
Heisman's go to stats and when you don't play but 3 or 4 real competative teams each season until the bowl season starts then performence/stats go through the roof!:idea:
Can you say Hawaii? McFadden is the real stound out in my opinion!:idea:

donzi5150
12-03-2007, 08:39 AM
2005 Arkansas ranked #45...
Team Recognized titles Winning years
Notre Dame 13 1924, 1929, 1930, 1938, 1943, 1946, 1947, 1949, 1953, 1966, 1973, 1977, 1988
USC 11 1928, 1931, 1932, 1939, 1962, 1967, 1972, 1974, 1978, 2003, 2004
Alabama 11 1925, 1926, 1930, 1945, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1973, 1978, 1979, 1992
Oklahoma 9 1949, 1950, 1953, 1955, 1956, 1974, 1975, 1985, 2000
Ohio State 7 1942, 1944, 1954, 1957, 1961, 1968, 2002
Michigan 7 1901, 1902, 1932, 1933, 1947, 1948, 1997
Minnesota 6 1934, 1935, 1936, 1940, 1941, 1960
Nebraska 5 1970, 1971, 1994, 1995, 1997
Pittsburgh 5 1916, 1918, 1936, 1937, 1976
Miami 5 1983, 1987, 1989, 1991, 2001
Texas 4 1963, 1969, 1970, 2005
Tennessee 4 1938, 1950, 1951, 1998
Georgia Tech 4 1917, 1928, 1952, 1990
Harvard 4 1910, 1912, 1913, 1919
Or
AP Champion
Rank Team Total Last
1 Notre Dame 8 1988
2 Oklahoma 7 2000
3 Alabama 6 1992
4t USC 5 2004
4t Miami 5 2001
6t Ohio State 4 2002
6t Nebraska 4 1995
6t Minnesota 4 1960
9 Texas 3 2005
10t Florida 2 2006
10t Florida State 2 1999
10t Tennessee 2 1998
10t Michigan 2 1997
10t Penn State 2 1986
10t Pittsburgh 2 1976
10t Army 2 1945
Sorry, but LSU is holding the BCS Trophy from that year.......The only co championship claim is in the minds of USC.......every year becouse of the system there is this thought out there and USC is the only school that cries foul about that year......

donzi5150
12-03-2007, 08:45 AM
The guy that picks up the tee when USC kicks off could play WR at LSU.
Meaning he would be more effective and used properly and be playing for the championship?:idea:

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 08:45 AM
Sorry, but LSU is holding the BCS Trophy from that year.......The only co championship claim is in the minds of USC.......every year becouse of the system there is this thought out there and USC is the only school that cries foul about that year......
Everyone outside the OSEC cries foul as the BCS is a corrupt system and the OSEC Commissioner is the Coordinator for it..
Great to see Tenn on that list but I guess that would be the only OSEC school with a Championship tradition.....

donzi5150
12-03-2007, 08:48 AM
I told my 5 year old daughter what you said and she said "SCOREBOARD BITCHES!"
I like your 5 year olds spunk but she is unfortuantly brain washed by a good team who plays only a couple of 1A teams per season and then plays the reast of the season in the JC league.......:jawdrop: :D :D :D

OKIE-JET
12-03-2007, 09:28 AM
It is kinda amusing that SOME conf can claim the old "share" of a nat'l champ.:D :D Hilarious!

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 09:55 AM
It is kinda amusing that SOME conf can claim the old "share" of a nat'l champ.:D :D Hilarious!Why?
Do you feel the BCS system is fair?
Do you feel it produces the most accurate champ?
Do you feel the best two teams are playing for the champ this year?
Do you feel it paired the best two teams in years past?
Do you feel the pairings are purely done on rankings versus location?
If any of those answers are no, then I would say folks who claim "share" have valid reasons to refute the BCS mock champ trophy...in absence of a playoff system...

lalhc
12-03-2007, 09:57 AM
Pete Carroll has a lot of motivating to do before the Rose Bowl game. USC is basically playing for nothing, which is tough to swallow for a team w/National title hopes. I wish they would of selected Georgia to play USC instead of Illinois.

STLRFAN
12-03-2007, 10:02 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't USC have the 2nd toughest schedule this year, right behing another PAC 10 team Washington.
Not really sure how in the hell LSU leap frogged everybody to get in the cahmpionship game. I was hoping LSU would have came to the Rosebowl..
Fight On!!!

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 10:11 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't USC have the 2nd toughest schedule this year, right behing another PAC 10 team Washington.
Not really sure how in the hell LSU leap frogged everybody to get in the cahmpionship game. I was hoping LSU would have came to the Rosebowl..
Fight On!!!
It helps when the OSEC commission is also the coordinator for the BCS.....they tend to cherry pick cause they don't travel well and the OSEC gets pounded by USC.

THOR
12-03-2007, 10:22 AM
It helps when the OSEC commission is also the coordinator for the BCS.....they tend to cherry pick cause they don't travel well and the OSEC gets pounded by USC.
Justify your schedule however you like. Stanford, Washington, Wazzou, etc. are all garbage regardless of what conference they play in.

THOR
12-03-2007, 10:24 AM
At least you admit your gay...that's the 1st step...:)..pink tiger suits for everyone....BTW...Happy Monday! :)
Interesting how the SEC fairs so well in the BCS selection when their Commissioner is the BCS Coordinator...:idea:
Dont be so bitter. This is supposed to be the most wonderful time of the year. But, when you lose to Stanford I guess your season is shot. Commence the bitterness.

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 10:44 AM
Dont be so bitter. This is supposed to be the most wonderful time of the year. But, when you lose to Stanford I guess your season is shot. Commence the bitterness.
Only wish OLSU would have scheduled Stanford...OLSU would have lost by two touchdowns....:)..

TrojanDan
12-03-2007, 10:46 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't USC have the 2nd toughest schedule this year, right behing another PAC 10 team Washington.
I think you can throw the tough schedule theory out the window. On paper the season looked tough but who knew how bad Notre Dame, Nebraska, and Cal (after OSU loss) were going to be. Our toughest game was Oregon who isn't sh*t without Dixon. ASU is a farce (:D had to throw that in for the AZ hommies).
Too bad Dixon got hurt. Would have loved to see them play for the Nat'l Championship instead of the Sun Bowl Championship. Should of, Could of, Would of is a bitch. :messedup:

OKIE-JET
12-03-2007, 11:05 AM
You know what's hilarious? When USC hung a double nickel on OU, the team of the century. :D :D
You'll prolly hang on to that forever, kinda reachin though aint ya Bob?:D
The hilarious part is that USC got beat by stanford:jawdrop: , which regardless of the rest, means no champ. game, cause they dont deserve it......And if you think they REALLY do, then I need to seriously reconsider what kind of weight I usually give your posts.:D
Why?
Do you feel the BCS system is fair?
Do you feel it produces the most accurate champ?
Do you feel the best two teams are playing for the champ this year?
Do you feel it paired the best two teams in years past?
Do you feel the pairings are purely done on rankings versus location?
If any of those answers are no, then I would say folks who claim "share" have valid reasons to refute the BCS mock champ trophy...in absence of a playoff system...
All the answers here are no, some people just cant accept that they may have gotten screwed and just go on and play harder. Its our policy to accept things according to the rules set in place and agreed upon by all, as a conference, not cry like a whiney assed bitch when the world dont go our way.
This si the main reason I cant stand Pete, great coach (collegiately speaking), whiney bitch.
And before ya bring up OK-OR, if youll remember, Stoops said nada, however the Big 12 commish squawked hard (with DAMN good reason I might add), but to say share the championship.....come on.

THOR
12-03-2007, 11:14 AM
They don't deserve to play in the champ game, but they are the best team in the country right now. That's a sentiment that's been echoed by many different people on a variety of radio and TV shows. Like Rome said, the two best teams aren't playing, but the two most deserving teams are.
Never end a sentence in a preposition.

warlock
12-03-2007, 11:17 AM
Wow, Ariz St got straight jobbed.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

OKIE-JET
12-03-2007, 11:29 AM
They don't deserve to play in the champ game, but they are the best team in the country right now. That's a sentiment that's been echoed by many different people on a variety of radio and TV shows. Like Rome said, the two best teams aren't playing, but the two most deserving teams are.
See Jon, its not that hard if you try.:D
Yes, the last sentance, in its entirety, is the absolute cold hard facts. SC is not the only program in history to be PERCIEVED as slighted. I should know, being a fan of the Big 12.
Never end a sentence in a preposition.
LOL!....no way!

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 11:30 AM
And before ya bring up OK-OR, if youll remember, Stoops said nada, however the Big 12 commish squawked hard (with DAMN good reason I might add), but to say share the championship.....come on.
Stoops did not squawk cause he does not support a playoff; plain and simple, can't call the kettle black.......he like alot of OSEC coaches are too worried about getting beat by a Hawaii or another west coast Cinderella (ala March Madness) and having their house of overrated cards come down.....they just keep their wallets fat, mouths shut with powderpuff schedules and location biased post season bowls..:)
BTW....I did not pay attention to Pete's speeches post game or any on Sunday...did he whine? What did say....? Serious...just asking...
Lots of spin thrown out by any coach in the top 6 Saturday night to mid day Sunday...obvisiously Miles did his part...

BajaT
12-03-2007, 11:33 AM
Go Hawaii........

OKIE-JET
12-03-2007, 11:34 AM
Stoops did not squawk cause he does not support a playoff; plain and simple, can't call the kettle black.......he like alot of OSEC coaches are too worried about getting beat by a Hawaii or another west coast Cinderella (ala March Madness) and having their house of overrated cards come down.....they just keep their wallets fat, mouths shut with powderpuff schedules and location biased post season bowls..:.
WOW...LaLa Land! LMAO!:D

BarryMac
12-03-2007, 11:43 AM
Go
U C L A :D :D

THOR
12-03-2007, 12:10 PM
Stoops did not squawk cause he does not support a playoff; plain and simple, can't call the kettle black.......he like alot of OSEC coaches are too worried about getting beat by a Hawaii or another west coast Cinderella (ala March Madness) and having their house of overrated cards come down.....they just keep their wallets fat, mouths shut with powderpuff schedules and location biased post season bowls..:)
BTW....I did not pay attention to Pete's speeches post game or any on Sunday...did he whine? What did say....? Serious...just asking...
Lots of spin thrown out by any coach in the top 6 Saturday night to mid day Sunday...obvisiously Miles did his part...
Maybe you should be a coach, better yet, a sport commentator. After all, your opinion regarding the toughest conference is new. Nobody that is an expert believes the PAC 10 is the best. You should go on TV and state your case. But, dont take it personally when they laugh out loud at you. :rolleyes:

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 12:27 PM
Maybe you should be a coach, better yet, a sport commentator. After all, your opinion regarding the toughest conference is new. Nobody that is an expert believes the PAC 10 is the best. You should go on TV and state your case. But, dont take it personally when they laugh out loud at you. :rolleyes:
I go out to lunch and (Auburn) Tigger loses his way through the hundred acre woods..:)
http://www.poohfriends.com/characters/tigger_facts.gif
Where did I say the Pac10 is best? I think that Pink Tigger suit suits you but it is screwing with your reading comprehension or maybe that was your southern education....but go ahead and continue to try and disprove something I did not say....I am talking about SC...maybe come back with something of relevance when your team is actually still playing...08 perhaps? :)

THOR
12-03-2007, 01:08 PM
I go out to lunch and (Auburn) Tigger loses his way through the hundred acre woods..:)
http://www.poohfriends.com/characters/tigger_facts.gif
Where did I say the Pac10 is best? I think that Pink Tigger suit suits you but it is screwing with your reading comprehension or maybe that was your southern education....but go ahead and continue to try and disprove something I did not say....I am talking about SC...maybe come back with something of relevance when your team is actually still playing...08 perhaps? :)
Actually, they will be playing in '08 on New Years Day. Dont continue the jealousy and bitterness just because you never attended a school with honor and tradition. I never hear you talking about the 90's and USC. Or even a few years ago. Only recently. Drag your old UCLA shirts out when you wore them in the 90's along with your bandwagon tickets from back then. Who will be "your" team in another 10 years?
I was born and raised here brother, but was given a scholarship (actually a few) to attend Auburn. You just wouldnt understand.
Back on your meds Mbrown, you are starting to have a meltdown I think.

donzi5150
12-03-2007, 01:16 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't USC have the 2nd toughest schedule this year, right behing another PAC 10 team Washington.
Not really sure how in the hell LSU leap frogged everybody to get in the cahmpionship game. I was hoping LSU would have came to the Rosebowl..
Fight On!!!
Toughest schedule, toughest conference, ranked in the top 3 all but 1 week the whole season, undefeated in the whole season in regular game time, beat VT and Georgia was not in the Championship…..Who would you choose?

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 02:02 PM
Actually, they will be playing in '08 on New Years Day. QUOTE]
Sorry Tigger, I forgot about the Chick Fil A Championship bowl...:) sorry...btw, its on the 31st..which should be Disney's first animated horror in which they match up Tigger vs. Pooh :)
[QUOTE=THOR;2924334]Dont continue the jealousy and bitterness just because you never attended a school with honor and tradition.
Ummm...old material...play on...:)...For extra strength, go ahead and post up a copy of your degree to further substantiate your superior intellect..
I never hear you talking about the 90's and USC. Or even a few years ago. Only recently.
BTW...Hot Boat.com, nor the Internet as we know it, was really around in the 90's so I had tough time of supporting them publicly back then......
as for me and a couple years ago......I don't think I have been quiet...the board back then even thought the OSEC and OLSU were Overrated..
http://www.***boat.com/forums/showthread.php?t=37780&highlight=USC
Drag your old UCLA shirts out when you wore them in the 90's along with your bandwagon tickets from back then. Who will be "your" team in another 10 years?
I actually went to games in 90's when my brother in law had season tickets...as we were stuggling, we would just hope for the big wins...UCLA and Notre Dame..:) and that was challenging at times as we were on the losing end of those battles....also had a chance to see Peete play in 88; great games.....I take the good with the bad...
I was born and raised here brother, but was given a scholarship (actually a few) to attend Auburn. You just wouldnt understand.
Do you have those degrees and full ride offer letters scanned and posted yet to further substantiate your superior intellect? :)...Congrats on your higher education..
you are starting to have a meltdown I think.If meltdown is now considered owning you, correcting you and schooling you....then I guess I am having one! :)

THOR
12-03-2007, 02:17 PM
MBrownie button,
maybe meltdown was the wrong term. Are you menstrating?
And yes, I do have a superior intellect than you.

rlj676
12-03-2007, 02:23 PM
So how's there no mention of the team that got completely f-ed over by the BCS? How is Mizzou number 6, while 8 and 13, both of whom lost to MU are in the BCS bowl games? Obviously losing to OK twice is bad, but they aren't exactly a weak team.
This is indicative of the BCS system that doesn't reward teams that "deserve" anything, but the ones where fans and there money will show up, or something other than merit.
Oh, I guess they forgot to see the number of MU fans that made it to San-Antonio last Sun.
And SEC-Pac 10 is a good comparison, as long as everyone can agree the Big 10 is the most overrated conference year in and out.

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 02:25 PM
And yes, I do have a superior intellect than you.
Tigger, at least you got the hobbies right :)
http://www.poohfriends.com/characters/tigger_facts.gif

OKIE-JET
12-03-2007, 02:40 PM
So how's there no mention of the team that got completely f-ed over by the BCS? How is Mizzou number 6, while 8 and 13, both of whom lost to MU are in the BCS bowl games? Obviously losing to OK twice is bad, but they aren't exactly a weak team.
This is indicative of the BCS system that doesn't reward teams that "deserve" anything, but the ones where fans and there money will show up, or something other than merit.
Oh, I guess they forgot to see the number of MU fans that made it to San-Antonio last Sun.
And SEC-Pac 10 is a good comparison, as long as everyone can agree the Big 10 is the most overrated conference year in and out.
Because the BCS bowls can only have a 2 team max from any one conference. The bigguns that issss.

rlj676
12-03-2007, 02:44 PM
Because the BCS bowls can only have a 2 team max from any one conference. The bigguns that issss.
I know the "rules", but the real problem is selecting KU over MU, and forgoing any other teams more deserving than Ill to keep the pac-10 v big-10 matchup.
That's fine though, the big 10 is set up to get blown out in about 4 games (again).

THOR
12-03-2007, 02:47 PM
Tigger, at least you got the hobbies right :)
http://www.poohfriends.com/characters/tigger_facts.gif
Your obsession with Tigger (and me) is bothersome and borderline gay. Actually, it is really gay.

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 03:12 PM
Your obsession with Tigger (and me) is bothersome and borderline gay. Actually, it is really gay.
Tigger,
Being straight and all, I have no clue what might be considered gay....For all I know it could be the use of "bothersome" in a post.....or maybe posts like this..in reference to swinging from OSEC nuts...
Better to swing than swallow Carrols load
Keep it up Tigger.....with your posts, you would have received an invite to the Chick Fil A bowl of Meaningless Posts..:)

OKIE-JET
12-03-2007, 03:25 PM
Just a little something I found interesting (surprisingly), a few minutes ago checkin out espn on the tube. They seem to be in agreement as to the two best teams being in the championship game, also in agreement as to who has a legit argument to be in as well, and it WASNT SC.:D

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 04:00 PM
Just a little something I found interesting (surprisingly), a few minutes ago checkin out espn on the tube. They seem to be in agreement as to the two best teams being in the championship game, also in agreement as to who has a legit argument to be in as well, and it WASNT SC.:D
Who was it that was talking on ESPN? Listening to them on Saturday I actually think a few of the commentators helped LSU get into the #1 game...at least two folks mentioned they should leap frog teams...it helps to have spinsters on yourside after the last game of the season....
Although, I would love a playoff....given the current rules, SC don't deserve to be there with two losses..
The Okie's lost at the wrong time...I actually thought they had a chance at the #1 game....

THOR
12-03-2007, 04:14 PM
Tigger,
Being straight and all, I have no clue what might be considered gay....
Somehow, I dont buy that. You know gay very well and it knows you. But, it is your lie, tell it however you want.

donzi5150
12-03-2007, 04:22 PM
Undefeated in regular season game time. That's priceless. USC would beat LSU tomorrow by 10 points minimum.
You like that one......Well Pete was making excuses on Fox about their two losses and how banged up they were in the middle of the season....Did you hear Les Miles talk about the QB, Matt FLynn and his High Ankle sprain and the games he missed? or All American Wide Receiver Early Doucet and his groin injury that sidlined him for 5 games, or Defensive Lineman and probably #1 overall pick Glen Dorsey had that illegal knee chop that has had him at 50% and in and out of the past few games, or #2 QB, Ryan Perriloux and his suspension for an off campus brawl and the two other players that were kicked off the team for that incident, or Mr. 5'6" 160lb 4.2 40 with his shoulder injuy........So who would beat who or who is going to make excuses or claim a co-championship:D :D :D :D

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 04:35 PM
Somehow, I dont buy that. You know gay very well and it knows you. But, it is your lie, tell it however you want.
But, it is your lie, tell it however you want.
Tigger,
All your talk about loads and choads, your facination with me and my preference...can we just get back to some good ol' fashion football :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH6eO6mj60Y

donzi5150
12-03-2007, 04:52 PM
LSU is not as reliant on the QB position to dominate the game. They're still running the wing T at LSU.
USC would beat LSU by 10 points, minimum. I said it before and I'll say it again. LSU would have no answer for Booty and his 5 blue chip, 6'3"+ WRs. Hell, they couldn't even stop Kentucky.
Funny, I was defending Booty early this season on another football thread and the majority of the SC fans said put in Sanchez, or what ever the 2nd QB is........Were they catching the balls when he was strugling? Blue chip receivers make a struggling good QB look good....the fans dont ask for the QB to be pulled when they are struggling like earlier.......Did I remind you that Booty is a Louisiana boy?:D LSU passed on him.......

THOR
12-03-2007, 07:37 PM
Tigger,
All your talk about loads and choads, your facination with me and my preference...can we just get back to some good ol' fashion football :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH6eO6mj60Y
Browneye,
the aforementioned post was just a repeat of what I already said regarding you giving Carrol a post game handy. Does he allow you to get off the bandwagon long enough to accomplish that?

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 09:12 PM
Browneye,
the aforementioned post was just a repeat of what I already said regarding you giving Carrol a post game handy. Does he allow you to get off the bandwagon long enough to accomplish that?
Tigger....with a name like Thor (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=I+Am+Thor) you would think you would stay away from the gay stuff.......
Let's get back to football :) What's the record of the Pac 10 (or 8) vs the Sorry Excuse Conference? something like 150 to 70 something..or what is SC's record against the Sorry Excuse Conference.....:)

mbrown2
12-03-2007, 09:20 PM
Sorry Excuse Conference fans always call Pac10 defenses weak, but at least we leave our dogs at home....must be a southern thing..:)
http://www.loldemon.com/236-Dog_Bites_Auburn_Player.html

BajaT
12-04-2007, 05:40 AM
"Dont continue the jealousy and bitterness just because you never attended a school with honor and tradition. "
Sorry, but this sounds a bit gay... C's get degrees brother. It is all about girls in sun dresses 8 months of the year,........SDSU
Since the Aztecs were far from making a bowl, Go Hawaii

THOR
12-04-2007, 07:02 AM
Tigger....with a name like Thor (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=I+Am+Thor) you would think you would stay away from the gay stuff.......
Let's get back to football :) What's the record of the Pac 10 (or 8) vs the Sorry Excuse Conference? something like 150 to 70 something..or what is SC's record against the Sorry Excuse Conference.....:)
The record was posted before. The PAC10 is still and will always be 2nd best. That really isnt that bad to be first in socal, but second across the nation. Dont take is to hard. Let is go. This entire thread has caused too much turmoil and destroyed one marriage as Browneye now is gay.

mbrown2
12-04-2007, 07:23 AM
The record was posted before. The PAC10 is still and will always be 2nd best. That really isnt that bad to be first in socal, but second across the nation. Dont take is to hard. Let is go. This entire thread has caused too much turmoil and destroyed one marriage as Browneye now is gay.
That's all you got...you are like hitting a retarted kid....I end up being the bad guy....have a nice day and fight on! :)

donzi5150
12-04-2007, 09:17 AM
That's all you got...you are like hitting a retarted kid....I end up being the bad guy....have a nice day and fight on! :)
Ladies, you both have gotten off track......the SEC is the best and it will be proven on Jan 7th!:D :D :D

OKIE-JET
12-04-2007, 09:17 AM
Scoreboard
Bowls Wins Losses Ties Win %
SEC 352 177 162 13 .522
Big 12 304 144 157 4 .480
ACC 268 141 122 5 .536
Big Ten 226 111 112 3 .498
Pac-10 214 108 100 6 .519
Big East 100 46 52 2 .470
Breakdown the Pete Carrol deal again Bob. Limit it to only 3 quarter touchdown with a relative humidity of 30%. Jeeze you are reaching. Just realize you are second best and this will all be over.
Bring out your UCLA stats for the 90's since you were a fan of them in that era. Better yet, bring out the Stanford stats when Elway was there, BC stats when Flutie was there, and Florida stats when Emmet was there. Those are still filed in your bandwagon somewhere.
With these stats, how is it that the PAC-10 is second? They look fifth from here.:D

OKIE-JET
12-04-2007, 09:23 AM
Beating OSU will prove that the SEC is number one? OSU is maybe the 10th best team in the country. Maybe.
GOD has spoken...:D

mbrown2
12-04-2007, 09:30 AM
Ladies, you both have gotten off track......the SEC is the best and it will be proven on Jan 7th!:D :D :D Regardless of how they got there....LSU vs OSU should be a good game....I am looking forward to it..:)

OKIE-JET
12-04-2007, 09:43 AM
Look your screen in the eye and tell me that OSU is better than the 10th best team in the country in a VERY down year in Big Ten football. :D
....."screen in the eye"....good one! :D I do know they're not #1, but who is the 10th best? With this season, who knows? I also know Ok. is not the #3 team either, as much as it stings to say it.:idea:

eliminatedsprinter
12-04-2007, 01:03 PM
Last year LSU and Auburn got screwed and had to play teams that were not up to their level in their bowel games. This year it appears it is SC's turn to have it happen to them...

donzi5150
12-04-2007, 03:38 PM
They all should be good and I am looking forward to all of them including the Hawaii game and seeing how they do with the big boys........But I think I have beat the LSU drum enough and you guys know who I am pulling for.......Good luck to you all except the SC fans and of course the Buckeye fans........:D :D :D

Old Texan
12-05-2007, 06:54 AM
Except for their stunning and unexpected loss to Texas for the national championship in 2005, nobody has played USC to closer than 14 points in a bowl under Pete Carroll. Their average margin of victory is 22 points.
Stunning and unexpected to you. We knew we'd win. Vince Young vs. a frail Qb and future NFL utility back, not contest. :devil:

mbrown2
12-05-2007, 09:20 AM
Stunning and unexpected to you. We knew we'd win. Vince Young vs. a frail Qb and future NFL utility back, not contest. :devil:
The Vince Young Longhornes were a great team for one year.....this year the Texas Longhornes would have lost to the Dylan Panthers...:)

THOR
12-05-2007, 09:20 AM
.
Never happen twice.
You are right. I would ever single time they play and twice on Sunday. Texas was bigger and faster.

THOR
12-05-2007, 09:40 AM
Shit, you give Carroll a week to prepare after seeing that game and Young would have never run for another yard.
How long did you have to prepare for Stanford? LMAO.

mbrown2
12-05-2007, 10:57 AM
How long did you have to prepare for Stanford? LMAO.
LMAO...that was good!:)

OKIE-JET
12-05-2007, 11:42 AM
How long did you have to prepare for Stanford? LMAO.HeHe!:D

THOR
12-05-2007, 01:34 PM
Unfortunately, I think preparing for Stanford involved a team trip to Fritz's.
That will get you fired and in good spirits.

Old Texan
12-05-2007, 02:31 PM
All of Texas knew they'd win, the rest of the universe had USC and the points.
It took the game of the century for them to eek out a win. Never happen twice. Enjoy the Peach Bowl or the AFLAC Insurance Bowl or whatever you're playing in this year.
You overestimate the popularity of USC outside CA...........And be thankful Oregon lost their QB or USC would be plauing a far lesser venue than the Rose Bowl.

donzi5150
12-06-2007, 09:18 AM
You're out of your mind if you think anybody outside of Texas and, possibly, Vince Young's mom, thought that they were going to win.
LSU can be thankful about Oregon too.
All teams can be thankful to other teams for losses........every team depends on each other to perform and not perform so singling out the next National Champions, LSU, is not warented.........:idea:

mbrown2
12-06-2007, 09:48 AM
Who else is a little bummed that we have to wait till end of December for more college football....
Seems the pros is decidedly being handled by 1 maybe 2 more teams...other then that it seems like a pretty boring season...

Old Texan
12-06-2007, 04:10 PM
Just turning around what's posted, like I always do.
And for the sake of civility I won't bring up the "Bottle of Booze" bet an overconfident someone didn't pay up on 2 years ago next National Championship. Vince Young's Mom remembers too. ;)
Apparently the polls aren't seeing USC in the same light as those in CA. Since the 2006 Championship they haven't met the critieria in anything but the fantasy leagues.
Still can't accept Texas beat them on the field no doubts, no bad calls, just heads up better football resulting in a higher score when the clock ran out. :D

Havasu1986
12-06-2007, 04:18 PM
You overestimate the popularity of USC outside CA...........And be thankful Oregon lost their QB or USC would be plauing a far lesser venue than the Rose Bowl.
BTW...Are you coming out to San Diego to watch Texas play in the grand daddy of all bowl games "The Holiday Bowl" :eek: :D

JakeAisA
12-06-2007, 04:49 PM
Thor,
I just jumped on this board and saw that you think your conference’s success means jack. It's the best conference, but so what?
It's a joke to root for a particular conference. You're a joke and a mouth-piece. Conferences don't win spit-teams do. Your pride comes from being in the SEC. That doesn't mean anything, except to SEC losers trying to justify losses. USC's pride comes from championships and Rose Bowl victories. What other schools do in the SEC is not a reflection on your school's program. SC fans know there's SC, then the rest of the Pac-9. You sound, well, you sound jealous. Our loss to Stanford is not a reflection on your program. We know what that loss did to us, it's embarrassing, it cost a possible championship, we know that--but we don't cry about it and start whining about the SEC. Our loss to Stanford isn't a reflection on Auburn. Nor is the rest of the SEC's success a reflection on Auburn. Auburn sucks and that's that. Win something and quote that stat. Auburn doesn't look better by quoting how good the winners in its conference are. Stop quoting meaningless conference stats--it's silly...like you...your argument...and Auburn. I sport an SC ring and shirt as often as possible, not a Pac-9 hat. Do you sport an SEC hat when you go out? No, you sport a stupid Auburn hat...thank god for Bo Jackson, huh?

Old Texan
12-06-2007, 05:11 PM
BTW...Are you coming out to San Diego to watch Texas play in the grand daddy of all bowl games "The Holiday Bowl" :eek: :D
It's an off year due to injuries and weakness in several areas plus they lost to A&M. Quite frankly I haven't paid attention enough to remember what bowl UT is headed to. 2006 Champs is history but they won the actual game not a fantasy rematch on the internet.:D
Without a playoff format I'm having a lot of trouble being interested in any of the bowl matchups. In fairness LSU-OSU are probably the most deserving under the current format. OSU with 1 loss and LSU with their 2 being in triple OT. But the top 10 or 8 or 6 would make it an interesting playoff.
Oklahoma looks the strongest on paper for next season and should end up the 2008 preseason No. 1.

THOR
12-06-2007, 07:56 PM
Our loss to Stanford is not a reflection on your program. We know what that loss did to us, it's embarrassing, it cost a possible championship, we know that--but we don't cry about it and start whining about the SEC.
JackassIsI,
okay.
ps
you lost to a team that wasnt in the top 94. Nice.
Dont feel back, you will always sleep well knowing two things. One, you are in a conference that is second best. Two, you have no idea how to form a sentence. You seem a little young to drink so heavily. Do your parents know you are logged in on their computer.

THOR
12-06-2007, 07:57 PM
Who else is a little bummed that we have to wait till end of December for more college football....
Seems the pros is decidedly being handled by 1 maybe 2 more teams...other then that it seems like a pretty boring season...
Dude,
the pros are heating up nicely. The Bears game coming up is an elimination game. That will be intense. College hoops sucks right now though.

mbrown2
12-06-2007, 08:35 PM
Dude,
the pros are heating up nicely. The Bears game coming up is an elimination game. That will be intense. College hoops sucks right now though.
I hoping the PAC10 can live up to the hoop hype this year...hopefully the season will get better...

THOR
12-06-2007, 09:09 PM
I hoping the PAC10 can live up to the hoop hype this year...hopefully the season will get better...
Hoops is much like football. Dont get a bad loss toward the end of the year. Also, get in the west bracket if you are in the PAC10

donzi5150
12-07-2007, 10:47 AM
Thor,
I just jumped on this board and saw that you think your conference’s success means jack. It's the best conference, but so what?
It's a joke to root for a particular conference. You're a joke and a mouth-piece. Conferences don't win spit-teams do. Your pride comes from being in the SEC. That doesn't mean anything, except to SEC losers trying to justify losses. USC's pride comes from championships and Rose Bowl victories. What other schools do in the SEC is not a reflection on your school's program. SC fans know there's SC, then the rest of the Pac-9. You sound, well, you sound jealous. Our loss to Stanford is not a reflection on your program. We know what that loss did to us, it's embarrassing, it cost a possible championship, we know that--but we don't cry about it and start whining about the SEC. Our loss to Stanford isn't a reflection on Auburn. Nor is the rest of the SEC's success a reflection on Auburn. Auburn sucks and that's that. Win something and quote that stat. Auburn doesn't look better by quoting how good the winners in its conference are. Stop quoting meaningless conference stats--it's silly...like you...your argument...and Auburn. I sport an SC ring and shirt as often as possible, not a Pac-9 hat. Do you sport an SEC hat when you go out? No, you sport a stupid Auburn hat...thank god for Bo Jackson, huh?
When the SEC fans talk about the SEC we are talking about the respect and the power that the majority of the teams in the conference not 3 or 4 like in the Big or PAC conferences......It has been acknowledged by the experts for years that the SEC is the most physically capable and punishing week end and week out and by the end of he season it is a testiment on the team that can make it through to the National Championship.....ALL SEC games are not taken for granted, it's just Stanford,.....they are respected.....USC, Ohio State, Michigan plays a couple of Junior College teams each season so the the injuries and physical exhaustion are not evident week end and week out.... I know LSU plays Tulane every year but look at all the SEC teams that were in the TOP 25 each week, I think that we peaked at 8 teams for a couple of weeks....that is a testimont each and every week how tough the conference is nd if I remember correctly we had the most top 25 teams each week of the season per conference.......Rose Bowl does not count know if your not number 1 at the end of he season.......LSU is picked 5 1/2 right now over Ohio State....Does that currently prove my point about the respect of the SEC....number 2 over number 1?:idea: :idea: :idea: