PDA

View Full Version : The LA Times is a left-wing rag and shills for the Democrats



MagicMtnDan
10-02-2003, 09:37 AM
Today's three column headline (huge) screams about Arnold supposedly "groping" 6 women over a thirty year period. Four of the women are un-named.
Personally, I sure as hell hoped Arnold got more than 6 women in thirty years. As for the "groping" crap and how "humiliated" (one of the six women felt) they were that's pure left-wing attack BS!
Five days before the election and that's the best the anti-Arnold/Republicans and the left-wing LA Times can do?! That's it?! Six women groped, 4 of them unnamed?! And the LA Times screams it across the headlines like it's a major story like an effen earthquake or terrorist attack?!
What did the LA Times do when Cruz Bustamante said the word "nigger" in public? Oh wait, you didn't know about that? Yeah, it's true but of course the LA Times didn't scream that (personally it's not a big deal nor is the Arnold "story") but it just demonstrates that THE LA TIMES HAS A LIBERAL AGENDA and, just like that bitch Huffington, will stop at nothing to hurt him in the election.
Vote for Arnold to make the state better AND to get back at the LA Times!

Irishluck
10-02-2003, 09:47 AM
I did hear on KABC that Arnold admitted to fondling women back when he was younger. I don't really give a shit if he did or didn't, he's a human being just like everyone else. I am just tired of the negative ads about him by the democrats five days before the election. Watch how brutal it will get over this weekend, just goes to show you what a bunch of sore losers they are.

summerlove
10-02-2003, 09:53 AM
Irishluck:
I did hear on KABC that Arnold admitted to fondling women back when he was younger. I don't really give a shit if he did or didn't, he's a human being just like everyone else. I am just tired of the negative ads about him by the democrats five days before the election. Watch how brutal it will get over this weekend, just goes to show you what a bunch of sore losers they are. It's called politics! The last weekend of any election is always filled with hit mail and tv spots - both sides do it. It's not right, but voters have come to expect them and they have a tendency to not have as much impact as they used to.

FRENCHIE
10-02-2003, 10:01 AM
Damn Democrats, it's all political bull shit!

River Lynchmob
10-02-2003, 10:02 AM
I dont know about any of you but im pretty damn sure just about every red blooded heterosexual american male has at one time or another has "gropped" a woman. WTF whos gives a shit, and why is it that it surfaces now? why not when he became a huge star he's worth 100's of millions now. at the times these women loved the attention that this famous athlete was paying to them. it's obvious its not about the money it's as you said the Times making a mountain out of an ant hill. BFD who he gropped 30 ****in years ago, it wont matter he's still going to win next tuesday. And the Times and all the other liberal dumbocrats can suck the big one. Just my .02

MagicMtnDan
10-02-2003, 10:33 AM
summerlove:
Irishluck:
I did hear on KABC that Arnold admitted to fondling women back when he was younger. I don't really give a shit if he did or didn't, he's a human being just like everyone else. I am just tired of the negative ads about him by the democrats five days before the election. Watch how brutal it will get over this weekend, just goes to show you what a bunch of sore losers they are. It's called politics! The last weekend of any election is always filled with hit mail and tv spots - both sides do it. It's not right, but voters have come to expect them and they have a tendency to not have as much impact as they used to. The LA Times screaming headline IS politics. But newspapers aren't supposed to be so blatant in making a mountain out of a molehill only days before the election. They're a newspaper for the people not the Democrats, right?
By the way, you do realize of course that the LA Times had reporters out looking for dirt on Arnold, right? That's how they came up with this nonsense.
Do you think they're looking for dirt on Joe Gray Davis or Cruz-ee?

Irishluck
10-02-2003, 10:44 AM
MagicMtnDan:
summerlove:
Irishluck:
I did hear on KABC that Arnold admitted to fondling women back when he was younger. I don't really give a shit if he did or didn't, he's a human being just like everyone else. I am just tired of the negative ads about him by the democrats five days before the election. Watch how brutal it will get over this weekend, just goes to show you what a bunch of sore losers they are. It's called politics! The last weekend of any election is always filled with hit mail and tv spots - both sides do it. It's not right, but voters have come to expect them and they have a tendency to not have as much impact as they used to. The LA Times screaming headline IS politics. But newspapers aren't supposed to be so blatant in making a mountain out of a molehill only days before the election. They're a newspaper for the people not the Democrats, right?
By the way, you do realize of course that the LA Times had reporters out looking for dirt on Arnold, right? That's how they came up with this nonsense.
Do you think they're looking for dirt on Joe Gray Davis or Cruz-ee? I agree with you MMD the L.A. Times is nothing more than a Democrat newspaper. All they ever seem to do is bring up shit that is so ridiculous in claim that I don't think liberals even believe what they say anymore. As far as bringing up dirt on Grey Davis and Cruk Bustamante, well Californias problems speak for its self.

coolerguy
10-02-2003, 11:35 AM
El Tiempo de Los Angeles a liberal newspaper...no way! wink

summerlove
10-02-2003, 12:21 PM
MagicMtnDan:
summerlove:
Irishluck:
I did hear on KABC that Arnold admitted to fondling women back when he was younger. I don't really give a shit if he did or didn't, he's a human being just like everyone else. I am just tired of the negative ads about him by the democrats five days before the election. Watch how brutal it will get over this weekend, just goes to show you what a bunch of sore losers they are. It's called politics! The last weekend of any election is always filled with hit mail and tv spots - both sides do it. It's not right, but voters have come to expect them and they have a tendency to not have as much impact as they used to. The LA Times screaming headline IS politics. But newspapers aren't supposed to be so blatant in making a mountain out of a molehill only days before the election. They're a newspaper for the people not the Democrats, right?
By the way, you do realize of course that the LA Times had reporters out looking for dirt on Arnold, right? That's how they came up with this nonsense.
Do you think they're looking for dirt on Joe Gray Davis or Cruz-ee? The politics of politics sucks, I'll agree to that. The Arnold and the groping, as recently as 2000, reminds me of the Jennifer Flowers suspicion surrounding Clinton - the past actions of a candidate is all fair game - especially in politics. We, as voters, need to know the type of person we're electing to run our state. I certainly wouldn't want someone with a checkerd past to get elected and find out later that the person hasn't changed. Arnold, by his own admission today in San Diego stated that he was sorry for his past actions. Kind of like getting caught raiding the cooking jar and being caught by mom. He wouldn't have said anything had it not come to light. He also stated that everything said in the LA Times article wasn't necessairly true, but that where there is smoke there is fire.
Cruz's past is being drubbed up, as is just about everyone else's. We all heard about the precosiousness of Clinton and the past drinking problems of our current President. In Clinton's case (with regard to Flowers), he was reelected and the matter didn't hurt him (until the Monica affair) - but I think the people needed to know - it's a matter of disclosure. The voters will decide, and Arnold will most likely win.
It's not just the dem's going after the rep's, it's all about gaining the edge, presenting doubt in the minds of voters, and trying to get elected. It's not a one sided affair - both sides are guilty of this and when the worm turns it is uncomfortable for the other side, in this case the Arnold camp. While some may critize the LA times, the same goes for the fox network being a "spin zone" for the republican platform...Not all media is going to be completely balanced - just look at the Nat'l Enquirer!

CA Stu
10-02-2003, 12:23 PM
MagicMtnDan:
The LA Times screaming headline IS politics. But newspapers aren't supposed to be so blatant in making a mountain out of a molehill only days before the election. They're a newspaper for the people not the Democrats, right? !!!NEWSFLASH!!!
The LA Times is a private business and can report whatever the hell it pleases, no matter how biased or prejudicial it may be.
Notice how they always endorse candidates and give their recommendation as to who to vote for?
Obviously it is a pinko rag, just like 95% of all newspapers. All the reporters that work there have gone to a college where they were programmed by left wing socialist professors (that make their living sucking the tit of the government) to be a bunch of liberal bleeding heart holier-than-thou sensationalist rumor mongers. :mad:
Thanks God I'm uneducated! Thanks Mom!
CA Stu <--uneducated, but not stoopid.
[ October 02, 2003, 01:26 PM: Message edited by: CA Stu ]

No.1 Gurupie
10-02-2003, 12:24 PM
Ca Stu -
amen

Trailer Park Casanova
10-02-2003, 03:50 PM
Dan,
That Anti Arnold story in todays Times was run in Parade Magazine about a year ago.
Six months before that,, Parade also ran a story about a Grey Davis female staffer that was hit and assaulted by Davis himself in her office because she got a new release wrong. Witnesses corraborated the incident.
Where's that story?
Man.. I dislike Democrats for this kinda stuff.,,,
They promise something for nothing,, then deliver nothing for something.
The LA Time sucks.
[ October 02, 2003, 07:24 PM: Message edited by: Trailer Park Casanova ]

Irishluck
10-02-2003, 04:02 PM
Trailer Park Casanova:
Dan,
That Anti Arnold story in todays Times was run in Parade Magazine about a year ago.
Six months before that,, Parade also ran a story about a Grey Davis female staffer that was hit and assaulted by Davis himself in her office because she got a new release wrong. Witnesses collaborated the incident.
Where's that story?
Man.. I dislike Democrats for this kinda stuff.,,,
They promise something for nothing,, then deliver nothing for something. Davis is such a ****ing ass, oh well he'll be gone in a few short days. Let the L.A. Times piss and moan for awhile when he's ousted. Go Arnie!

77charger
10-02-2003, 07:31 PM
At least arnold cam come foward and admit that he has done somethings not appropriate before back in the late 70s or whenever.Seems like he has nothing to hide.
Baghdad davis on the other hand well his time is almost up.and he hides behind everything

HCS
10-02-2003, 07:36 PM
Every time I grope a women she marries me! eek!
Don't ask how many times. :D