PDA

View Full Version : trying to start some political Bull$hit



mickeyfinn
01-05-2004, 04:50 PM
Just thought I would post this and see if any of the liberal scum will come crawling out of the wood work:
Getting colder here so thought I would see if someone could heat it up a little.....
OK, now, let's see who's the criminal, who's bought, who's
unpatriotic...
Clinton has gotten super-rich by, among other things, turning the
office of the Presidency into a cathouse.
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2000/9/28/233600
Clinton got 10 million for his memoirs. This is from one of the large
corporations the liberal like to scream about that are so corrupt. So
how corrupt are they? Well, the publisher, random House, is owned by
German media giant Bertelsmann. Hmmm... German support was pretty
strong as long as Clinton was carrying water for the liberals, and as
soon as a conservative gets in the White House German support
disappeared.
Clinton sold nuclear and ballistic secret technology to China and as a
result China now has ballistic nuclear missiles that can reach
mainland U.S. http://politicaltexan.com/wwwboard/messages/45.html
The Bush administration, accused of being "bought" by the big
corporations, is actually investigating Sun MicroSystems selling of
computers to China during the -- you guessed it -- Clinton
administration. I wonder who was really bought? These computers help
China build ballistic missiles that will be used to target the U.S.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/10/3/190315.shtml
He was in favor of China taking over the Panama Canal, which would
seriously damage the U.S. ability to defend itself should China then
use their ballistic missiles.
He sold out Long Beach harbor to a Chinese military front -- after
they gave big bucks to his '96 re-election campaign.
http://users.rcn.com/virtual.nai/sot/wt1.htm
He sold the White House and his administration to anyone who would
"donate" big bucks to his re-election campaign, or who would give
large amounts of money to Clinton's brother Roger or to Clinton's
business partners.
We now have documented evidence that Clinton accepted and did not
legally report 2 million dollars in campaign contributions. Peter Paul
went to the authorities about his contribution because he simply did
not want to take the rap for his contribution being handled
improperly. Will the republicans follow up on this? I doubt it -- they
are a bunch of wimps. Will this get reported in the "free press"? I
doubt it. Will the liberal scream about it until it does get reported,
as they would if it were a conservative? Let's not get silly....
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/7/16/212316.shtml
He gave unprecedented pardons in the final minutes of his
administration to convicted felons for no other reason than they
donated big bucks to his re-election campaign. Pardons were granted
for people like convicted drug dealer Carlos Vignale, who was caught
in 1994 trying to smuggle 800 pounds of cocaine into Minnesota.
Bush smiles when the press insult and ridicule him to his face. What
did Clinton do when a normal citizen simply said, referring to the
death of Americans in Saudi arabia, "You suck and those boys died."
Well, Clinton had them imprisoned and later had the IRS audit them.
Thanks liberals for being so diverse and accepting of everyone's
ideas. http://www.dailyrepublican.com/clintoninsulted.html. As
Congressman Robert Livingston said, "If you criticize the president,
are you going to be arrested by a bunch of federal agents and thrown
in jail overnight?" Apparently you will be if the president is a
liberal. But the liberals won't say anything negative about it.
Clinton made big bucks from his Whitewater land deal.
http://www.etherzone.com/1998/reich2.html. Hilary made big bucks with
inside information trading cattle futures. Why is it that the liberals
who are so concerned about these kind of illegal activities don't seem
to notice them at all when "their guy" is doing it?
Liberals like to criticize Reagan getting large sums for speaking tour
engagements after he left office. When did we hear liberals complain
about Clinton charging $1,400 to shake his hand in Europe (in 2001
speaking tour)? http://www.stormpages.com/brainstrain/july.html
He avoided 'Nam -- not by doing some other alternative service as Bush
and Quail -- but he managed to get a high-up military official to
write him a letter excusing him from service, then he went to England,
burned his draft card, and later went to Moscow and protested against
the U.S. in the capital of the enemy country of the U.S.
He got re-elected in 1996 NOT because of the good economy -- remember,
he never even got more than 50% of the vote, I think it was more like
46% or something like that -- instead he got re-elected because Perot
got in the race and many conservatives who were dissatisfied with Bush
going back on his promise of "no new taxes" voted for Perot. THAT'S
what gave Clinton the election.
After he was elected Hilary fires the entire White House Travel Office
staff so they wouldn't have to worry about their inappropriate
spending of funds getting discovered.
Hilary Clinton has three times perjured herself about testimony given
to Congress investigating various Clinton-era scandals. Will the "free
press" ever report on these?
Congressional subpoenas for White House records were constantly
delayed, more egregiously than any other administration who wants to
obey the law, sometimes for years, until they inexplicably "turn up"
in the White House on a table all by themselves and with Hilary's
fingerprints all over them.
Clinton is the only president to invite gang leaders for a summit and
for honors in the White House.
Clinton waged war in Eastern Europe in order to take attention off his
scandal with Monica Lewinski.
Clinton has been accused of rape by several women who are all women of
integrity.
We don't have to go into the accusations of cocaine and murder from
his Arkansas days -- which have been conveniently hushed up by the
"free press" in America. http://www.etherzone.com/1998/reich5.html.
We don't need to go into the details of the Vince Foster murder. That
was extensively reported on, but now we are finding out that the
government made "mistakes" in their investigations, which is why the
investigations went nowhere. The facts being discovered now actually
do support the claims by Clinton critics regarding the murder -- but
will this ever get reported? Will the liberals ever make an outcry
about the President of the United States being personally involved in
a murder? Apparently they would if tat president were conservative but
since it's "their guy" we will never hear them say anything except
defense of Clinton.
Clinton was and still is a pathological liar.
Clinton believes the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights are "radical"
documents. He made an appearance on the MTV show "Enough is Enough,"
April 19, 1994, and he stated, "...when we got organized as a country
and we wrote a fairly radical Constitution with a radical bill of
rights, giving a radical amount of individual freedom to Americans, it
was assumed that the Americans who had that freedom would use it
responsibly..." He and liberals like him don't believe the average
American is responsible enough -- and that's why they want to take
away most freedoms and vest the power for everything in a Washington
(liberal) elite.
Clinton believes that individual freedom is an anachronism that needs
to be replaced by a more socialistic state. This is because, according
to Clinton, "there's no family structure... there's a lot of
irresponsibility." Who do we have to thank for that? [Can you say --
the liberals...]
Clinton always supported the move for a "New World Order" and a
"one-World government" because he believes that the United Nations can
govern the U.S. better than we can. For example, on May 3, 1994,
Clinton signed Presidential Decision Directive 25, which describes how
American soldiers will serve under United Nations auspices.
Sidestepping Congress, Clinton often used the military as a Roman
Emperor would use a Praetorian Guard, to serve a personal agenda.
Clinton imposed the largest tax hike in history on the U.S. --
allegedly only affecting the "rich" until you find out that the
liberal's definition of the "rich" is anyone who earns over $30,000
per year.
He thinks there can be different definitions for what the word "is"
is.
Clinton -- and al Gore like him -- worked under the philosophy that
not getting caught is the same as being innocent. And liberals who
support these crooks typically have the same misconception.
And through all this nonsense, the Clinton administration was more
obsessed that was any other administration with -- you guessed it --
UFOs.
To sum it up, Clinton, and the liberals who are like him, have a lot
of "cess" left in their pool.
All this is documented and is true, unlike the shrill rhetoric, the
whining and complaining, and the hate speech coming from the liberals.
Clinton betrayed his country.
The media betrayed the truth by never following up on these facts, and
are continuing to betray the truth by the games they are playing with
G.W.
I could go on and on, of course, but you can see the pattern: The
liberals elected a president who said he would have the most integrity
in the White House, and as all good liars do, he turned right around
and did the opposite -- he had the most scandal-ridden Administration
in all of history.
So who's the "bad guy" here?
Looks to me like liberals are too stupid to remember the things"their"
guy does. then they get all up in arms about allegations, conspiracy
theories, and hate speech all of which has no basis in proof and all
of which pales in comparison to what "their" guy has done.

MagicMtnDan
01-05-2004, 04:58 PM
But slick Willie has an excuse - have you taken a look at Hillary lately?! :eek: Have you heard her voice when she's making speeches? Shrill beotch shatters glass!
http://home.earthlink.net/~dare2b/hillary.jpg
http://www.gambits.com/childers/senator-hillary.jpg

Dave C
01-05-2004, 05:01 PM
there certaintly seems to be quite a preponderance of evidence that Clinton was a scum-bag.
What I find interesting is how the big media kissed Clinton's behind and "loved" all his policies but they go out of their way to bash-Bush on everything he does and DOESN'T do.

HighRoller
01-05-2004, 05:17 PM
What's that sound? Oh, that must be AZ Don and Catmando getting their well reasoned responses warmed up.
AZDon: The country is in economic peril from Bush. The stock market is tanking! The..what's that? The stock market went up 25% this year? Anyways, retailers are suffering....what? Retail business had double digit gains 10 out of the 12 months? Okay, well people lost all their mutual fund money.....what do you mean mutual funds were up 42%? Okay, well....George W is a poopy head!!!! He's mean spirited! He's failing to get anything done in Iraq and our boys are......THEY CAPTURED WHO????
Catmando: Bush is waging an immoral war against the people of Iraq because my hero Sean Penn said so. No, I don't remember Sean saying anything about Clinton bombing thousands to death in Bosnia but it doesn't matter. Bush is nothing but a publicity hound, landing on carriers and sneaking into Baghdad. He could never be as honest as Bill Clinton. No, I don't remember Clinton playing the saxophone on Arsenio. But I do remember Bush stealing that darn election. Hail to the thief! I don't care if it WAS Al Gore who filed the first lawsuit. I don't care if Al Gore NEVER led the election. And I don't care if Democratic pollsters created hanging chads by stuffing multiple ballots in the machine for each vote. HOW DARE GW BUSH WIN THAT ELECTION!!! HE'S A POOPY HEAD! I read it in Al Franken's latest book so it must be true!

HighRoller
01-05-2004, 05:26 PM
Dave, what I love are the non-stop stories on the BAD economy. Here's how bad it really was in 2003:
NASDAQ up 44%
S&P 500 up 22%
Dow-Jones up 19%
Growth stock mutual funds up an average of 42%
Wal-Mart does ONE BILLION dollars business on the day after thanksgiving.
Lowe's sales up 14% for the year.
Unemployment at THE SAME LEVEL it was during the Clinton BOOM economy.
Christmas retail sales up 6%(A new record)
Auto sales at record levels due to 0% financing. When could you get 0% during Clinton/Gore?
Home mortgage rates at 5 percent average while property values continue to rise.
I could go on and on but I just wanted to prove the danger of network news shows and newspapers.. Getting your information from people who make a living selling bad news is NOT a good idea.