-
Based on the evidence, I believe that global warming is a matter of fact today. Because some argue scientific theory to the contrary doesn't make it any less real in my view. I don't believe that the movement to slow negative atmospheric changes, is a selfish ploy or corporate scheme. Many believe that this issue is so big, that only something as powerful as the Govt can begin to create a fix. Then there are those like many of you in this forum who don't believe that the Govt should do anything except preach Christian morality and fight wars. An oxymoron isn't it?
I see nothing but positive resulting from burring less fuel which is where reducing negative atmospheric changes begins. So why don't we all just get started? Because people like you characterize this issue as political, and call it left verses right and anything viewed as left must be contradicted at all costs.
Isn't time to come down from our political soap boxin and start viewing things as right and wrong instead of right and left. Burning less fuel is the right thing to do and you are aware of this.
This is so much Bullshit I shouldn't even respond.....The absolute total man caused greenhouse gasses are LESS than 5% of the gasses created here on earth...LESS than 5%......So take your "the sky is falling" retoric to your next algore book signing.........If you want to conserve natural resourses, that is a good thing. But do it for the sake of conservation, not because of some fairy tale about the sky is falling. The earth has gone through these heating/cooling cycles for billions of years. How pompus of modern man to think he could actually change anything...........Remember 10 or 15 years ago? These same morons were screaming about a coming ICE AGE!!! Try, as everyone who believes this shit will, you will not find a SINGLE qualified SCIENTIST to agree with you..........Ray
-
This is so much Bullshit I shouldn't even respond.....The absolute total man caused greenhouse gasses are LESS than 5% of the gasses created here on earth...LESS than 5%......So take your "the sky is falling" retoric to your next algore book signing.........If you want to conserve natural resourses, that is a good thing. But do it for the sake of conservation, not because of some fairy tale about the sky is falling. The earth has gone through these heating/cooling cycles for billions of years. How pompus of modern man to think he could actually change anything...........Remember 10 or 15 years ago? These same morons were screaming about a coming ICE AGE!!! Try, as everyone who believes this shit will, you will not find a SINGLE qualified SCIENTIST to agree with you..........Ray
Like I said, when something is viewed as coming from the left, you folks will do anything to contradict it, even make fools out of yourselves. Your right you shouldn't have even responded.
"you will not find a SINGLE qualified SCIENTIST to agree with you" This comment is as inane as your entire response.
-
So what's your personal contribution to saving the environment, "Paper or Plastic"?
I take the paper...my family are loggers.....
-
Bridge for sale! I've got a bridge for sale!
Any libs here wanna buy a bridge?:D
-
Bridge for sale! I've got a bridge for sale!
Any libs here wanna buy a bridge?:D
More 2 year old dribble. Schiada76, I have to give you credit for being consistant. Do you actually believe that your lib this or lib that BS makes you look any smarter than the stupid libs you so ofter describe? You are an embarrassment to the right.
-
I would expect no other answer from a fool.:D
Get it? That's why I post like that. You don't get it do you?
Dealing with liberals is just dealing with fools. You try to say global warming hysteria isn't political but that's all that is.
You ignore history, you ignore facts and run around like your hair's on fire in a panic over nothing but a sack of bullshit that you've bought into and are pissed that people that aren't brainwashed don't agree with you.
The earth is going to warm and cool with or without us, nothing we can do about. You know it and still repeat the Algores mantra.:rolleyes:
Now try to stay on topic, either deabte global warming or debate pollution. This is a global warming thread, try starting a pollution thred and see what kind of response you get.
-
You wanna see global warming? come to this effin frozen tundra of a state I live in, if buring tires and shit would warm it up, I am going to burn all I can.:mad:
Hey! Welcome back!
-
You are an embarrassment to the right.
Since the "Right" is, by definition, any ideology other than Communisim or Socialism, it is possible for us to have many forms of embarrassment as well as much to be proud of on the political "Right". However, since the "Left" is, by definition, those who embrace those two authoritarian and mostly failed ideologies, it is a national embarrassment, that America even has a political "Left".:)
I honestly wish "Liberalism" had not been taken over by "Leftism" in this country.
It is always good to have opposing ideologies, however I just wish someone would come up with a new and intellegent ideology, to embrace, when they decide to oppose the Conservatives and the status quo.:(
-
Then there are those like many of you in this forum who don't believe that the Govt should do anything except preach Christian morality and fight wars.
Although off topic, I would really like to hear how you arrive at the above conclusion.
-
I could go through them piecemeal, but I'd rather mow the yard.
Once again, we are back to ultra, doing the following:
Pseudoscience displays an indifference to facts.
Pseudoscience begins with a hypothesisusually one which is appealing emotionally, and spectacularly implausibleand then looks only for items which appear to support it
Pseudoscience is indifferent to criteria of valid evidence.
Pseudoscience relies heavily on subjective validation.
Pseudoscience depends on arbitrary conventions of human
culture, rather than on unchanging regularities of nature.
Pseudoscience does not progress.
Pseudoscience attempts to persuade with rhetoric, propaganda, and
misrepresentation rather than valid evidence (which presumably does not exist).
Pseudoscience argues from ignorance, an elementary fallacy.
Pseudoscience argues from alleged exceptions, errors, anomalies, strange events, and suspect claimsrather than from well-established regularities of nature.
Pseudoscience appeals to false authority, to emotion,
sentiment, or distrust of established fact.
Pseudoscience makes extraordinary claims and advances fantastic
theories that contradict what is known about nature.
Pseudoscience appeals to the truth-criteria of scientific
methodology while simultaneously denying their validity.
So I guess in the interest of burnig less fossil fuel, you'll be selling the boat, and the truck that tows it?
You going to take credit in 15 years when the earth is cooling off Ultra and we are headed for an Ice Age (like 1978, again)?