Hurricane Frances. Bill Clinton's heart bypass. Hurricane Frances. Bill Clinton's operation. On and on it went this past weekend. And now today the media is repeating over and over a "grim milestone" of 1,000 dead soldiers in the Iraq war. That's not something to be glossed over or forgotten but what about the slaughter in Russia?!
If you've read any of the newspaper (or online) coverage you'll notice that little to no mention is made of the ethnicity of the "terrorists" who slaughtered HUNDREDS OF CHILDREN. The networks and newspapers all covered the Abu Gharaib prison scandal repeatedly for days and days. But when MUSLIM EXTREMIST (Islamo-fascists) TERRORISTS slaughter hundreds of children the media gives it a brief mention and then it's on to what Kerry said and blah, blah, blah.
Why doesn't the media cover it? It's simple really. If they give the slaugher of hundreds of innocent children, women and men the proper amount of coverage than John and Jane Doe in America will see more brutal evidence of the enemy that we're all facing. And they'll be reminded of how important our security really is. And then they'll come to the realization that there's really no choice when it comes to who to vote for. They know that George Bush is the only choice for President if you're concerned with your safety and the safety of your family.
If you don't realize that the media is horribly biased ask yourself what about the slaughter of these children in Russia. And ask yourself one more question, what if 9/11 happened and countries around the world didn't cover the story? What would you say then? What would you say about their motives?