Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: More bad news for liberal scum

  1. #1
    Schiada76
    We are on the verge of totally wasting Fallujah. The liberal whiners aren't going to be able to keep whining "quagmire" "quagmire" for long.
    The Pres has been quoted saying " I have earned a lot of political capital, now it's time to spend it". Stand back liberal fags, watch a MAN go to work. :jawdrop:
    I hope all our Marines stay safe and come home well.

  2. #2
    v-drive
    I just got an e-mail from my son's friend in Iraq. He said that everyone with the exception of a handful and he emphesized handfull is elated that GW won. he said that it gave them all new resolve. v-drive

  3. #3
    Schiada76
    My SEAL friend is on cloud nine. He just got back and he was more afrid of Kerry than being deployed and he is in the SHIT. He was doing extractions and his stories scare the shit outa me.
    Tell your son's friend THANK YOU and be safe.

  4. #4
    angry dad
    God bless our troops!!! hoorah!!!! get some!!! :skull:

  5. #5
    kahanamoko
    We are on the verge of totally wasting Fallujah. The liberal whiners aren't going to be able to keep whining "quagmire" "quagmire" for long.
    The Pres has been quoted saying " I have earned a lot of political capital, now it's time to spend it". Stand back liberal fags, watch a MAN go to work. :jawdrop:
    I hope all our Marines stay safe and come home well.
    You're an idiot. Is this your idea of intelligent comment on the state of international politics? I don't suppose you could include a wish for safety to the soldiers, sailors and airmen that might find themselves in harms way as a result of this possible offensive. Additionally, I hope you are correct in assuming that the offensive ends the stalemate over there but based on the reports I've read it's somewhat of a gamble and extremely risky since not all of the radical insurgents are directly in the Fallujah area but many are located in surrounding cities. If the attack is unsuccesful, will you be so quick to blame Bush? No. Will I blame Bush. No. Perhaps for getting us in the country of Iraq in the first place, but now that we're there we have little choice but to attempt to end the current situation and gain control of the country so that we can work on some sort of exit strategy.

  6. #6
    steelcomp
    You're an idiot. Is this your idea of intelligent comment on the state of international politics? I don't suppose you could include a wish for safety to the soldiers, sailors and airmen that might find themselves in harms way as a result of this possible offensive. Additionally, I hope you are correct in assuming that the offensive ends the stalemate over there but based on the reports I've read it's somewhat of a gamble and extremely risky since not all of the radical insurgents are directly in the Fallujah area but many are located in surrounding cities. If the attack is unsuccesful, will you be so quick to blame Bush? No. Will I blame Bush. No. Perhaps for getting us in the country of Iraq in the first place, but now that we're there we have little choice but to attempt to end the current situation and gain control of the country so that we can work on some sort of exit strategy.
    It didn't sound to me as if he was commenting on int'l politics, rather just expressing an opinion on the war and the fact that Fallujah is about to fall. FINALLY!
    What reports do you read? The newspaper? FYI...They're not radical insurgents...they're f*ckin terrorists. The media just hasn't got the balls to call them what they are. And you say they're in other cities as well? Surrounding sities, no less? Wow, now that's got to be top secret!!!
    Why don't you for once in your life say something good and posative, instead of coming on here and picking everything that is said apart, just for the sake of doing just that? What a miserable life it must be in your skin.
    And for your brilliant observation and criticizm, he DID very intentionally wish good will for the soldiers there. Right at the bottom of his post. Last thing he said, jackass.
    Tyr being part of the solution, and not always trying to be a problem. You're offering nothing constructive here.

  7. #7
    kahanamoko
    It didn't sound to me as if he was commenting on int'l politics, rather just expressing an opinion on the war and the fact that Fallujah is about to fall. FINALLY!
    What reports do you read? The newspaper? FYI...They're not radical insurgents...they're f*ckin terrorists. The media just hasn't got the balls to call them what they are. And you say they're in other cities as well? Surrounding sities, no less? Wow, now that's got to be top secret!!!
    Why don't you for once in your life say something good and posative, instead of coming on here and picking everything that is said apart, just for the sake of doing just that? What a miserable life it must be in your skin.
    And for your brilliant observation and criticizm, he DID very intentionally wish good will for the soldiers there. Right at the bottom of his post. Last thing he said, jackass.
    Tyr being part of the solution, and not always trying to be a problem. You're offering nothing constructive here.
    Perhaps if you actually READ the post I quoted you'd realize that he wished MARINES good luck. Nothing about Soldiers, Airmen or Sailors. No well wishes to any British allies that might be fighting alongside our servicemembers.
    What is your problem with the term "radical insurgents"? And by the way, it although terrorist might be technically correct based upon the Webster Dictionary definition, we would also have to re-write every history book, political quote, newspaper article, etc. to indicate that every person who ever raised arms against the U.S. was a terrorist. If it makes you happier, call them terrorists. They are what they are and they are reprehensible. If it makes you feel better than me because you used the term "terrorist", then you truly miss the point of the situation in Iraq, the war on terrorism, and the risk to our servicemembers. But I suppose it makes you feel more "manly". Go back to thumping your chest, loser. In the meantime, why don't you leave the real fighting to those over there in harms way and stop acting like you were actually involved.

  8. #8
    steelcomp
    Perhaps if you actually READ the post I quoted you'd realize that he wished MARINES good luck. Nothing about Soldiers, Airmen or Sailors. No well wishes to any British allies that might be fighting alongside our servicemembers.
    What is your problem with the term "radical insurgents"? And by the way, it although terrorist might be technically correct based upon the Webster Dictionary definition, we would also have to re-write every history book, political quote, newspaper article, etc. to indicate that every person who ever raised arms against the U.S. was a terrorist. If it makes you happier, call them terrorists. They are what they are and they are reprehensible. If it makes you feel better than me because you used the term "terrorist", then you truly miss the point of the situation in Iraq, the war on terrorism, and the risk to our servicemembers. But I suppose it makes you feel more "manly". Go back to thumping your chest, loser. In the meantime, why don't you leave the real fighting to those over there in harms way and stop acting like you were actually involved.
    So Marines aren't soldiers, airmen or sailors?? WTF????And you claim you're in the Military?? I'm sure the Marines would just love to hear your opinion of them. They are the one branch of the military that are ALL OF THE ABOVE you dumbass!
    My problem with the terem "radical insurgents" is thgat it does not identify these poor excuses of human beings as what they really are. It's a term used by the media to "end around" the ruth in describing what we're facing there, and who the true enemy is. It's not all technical and legalese, nor is it very complicated. If you want to make a history lesson out of it, or argue some worthless simantic irrelevant issue, well, I guess that's your job. Not mine. They're terrorists. They don't deserve to be called anything better or more sophisticated. They are the low life scum of the earth and need to be identified as such, instead of being used by the liberal biassed media in order to promote it's anti war agenda, insulting the intelligence of the people of thias country. And you know what...I think in a majority of historical preportions, the people have said, "we aren't listening to your BS any more."
    As far as leaving the fighting to those in harm's way, I've been there, done that, you desk jockey weekend warrior make believe POS. I volunteered for regular service right up front, instead of backing my way in to a cushy desk job like you, you chicken shit. I'd just love to see you in combat. You'd probably piss your pants. You need to be REAL careful where you point your criticizm, dumbass. You have the audacity to call ANYONE a chest thumper? You come on here and stuff your unwanted, unrespected, and unwelcome arrogance and opinion like you're God's gift to us all and you're going to make sure every one of us knows how smart and superior you are, no matter what it is we say. Kinda like John F(uckin) Kerry. You sit behind your desk, reading all your legal CRAP, play weekend warrior soldier boy wannabe and think you have the right to come across as this righteous better than everyone else super savior?
    You're gong to point out to each and every one of us what our problems are, give us history lessons and puff that BIG chest of yours up? I've got some BIG news for you. NO one is impressed. NO one likes you, your opinion, your attitude, your arrogance, your disrespect, your insults, or anything else about you. And the sick part is, you like that! It only encourages you. You're a truely demented individual, and I really feel sorry for you. You are a perfect exmple why I left the military. Intellegent, well read, educated, but with the personality of ammonia. You stink and you're REALLY offensive.
    NO ONE HERE WANTS TO HEAR WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY!!!! WE DON'T LIKE YOU!!! YOU'RE A LOSER!!! (Lawyer...same thing) GO AWAY!!!

  9. #9
    kahanamoko
    Hmmmm. I think I've decided to NOT listen to your advice. I'll stay. Deal with it.
    Next, Marines are Marines and god bless them. Their not Soldiers. That's a term for Army servicemembers. Airmen is for Air Force. Sailor for the Navy. If you had ever been in the military you would know that. The media screws it up all the time but I would expect someone who had actually been in the military to know better. You're a poser! Give it up.
    You hang way to much importance on the term "terrorist". As if using that word somehow lowers their worth. Their ACTIONS lower their worth. Whether I use a factually accurate definition like "radical insurgent", or "enemy", or "terrorist", it is simply a word or description I use to make sure we all know of whom I speak. People like you that try to raise yourself up as better than others because you use what you think is a more derogatory word to describe these losers crack me up. I hate them. You hate them. America hates them. Good lord! Can you possibly be this stupid and still be able to operate a computer?

  10. #10
    Steve 1
    Go Away!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Liberal News Bias
    By donzi5150 in forum Political Phetoric
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-21-2008, 07:53 AM
  2. Channel Scum
    By Jokers Wild Havasu in forum Sandbar
    Replies: 249
    Last Post: 09-16-2006, 04:37 PM
  3. Read it and weep liberal scum
    By Schiada76 in forum Political Phetoric
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-06-2004, 06:16 AM
  4. Michael Moore is a Big Fat Liberal Pig (not news to you I'm sure)
    By MagicMtnDan in forum Political Phetoric
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 10-07-2004, 11:25 AM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-11-2004, 11:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •