I did that, but it wasn't a thread, just a post.
OK...you're off the hook. Post is nothing. If it was an actual thread then we would have to hunt you down and gut you like a fish.
That is because you posted it in SPANGLISH
No habla the spanglish!
Heck, I don't even habla Hansen........................
"As far as stumped, I still seem to be replying to your nothings and you are stumped...get off that v-drive guy now, he will be riced soon..........( . )( . )........Just for you thats when you get a midget and need some release of that little bit of pent up anger......piss-ant! Ringleys is looking for a clown, make some extra bucks RiceBoy!
I did that, but it wasn't a thread, just a post.
OK...you're off the hook. Post is nothing. If it was an actual thread then we would have to hunt you down and gut you like a fish.
OK...you're off the hook. Post is nothing. If it was an actual thread then we would have to hunt you down and gut you like a fish.
I think they just did that to Frenchie :messedup:
MagicMtnDan if you were talking with some one face to face
and they said you're an ass would you know if they spelled it right :idea:
And if I typed "running it hard in Beaumont" is a wannabe signature would you be able to read that? :messedup:
And if I typed "running it hard in Beaumont" is a wannabe signature would you be able to read that? :messedup:
your just jealous
Holy Crap Batman: I'm not saying I'm a smart guy but for God's sake some of these threads & replies are enough to make a third grade teacher turn over in the grave. I make mistakes for sure but trying to keep up with some of this spelling and train of thought requires a real effort! :rollside: NSF
Hukt on fonicks wurkd fore mi. :2purples:
A couple I notice regularly.....
The word etcetera is abbreviated with etc, not ect.
Voila is not walla.....
Its probably, not prolly.
I do admit to throwing in a gonna or dunno but it is done on purpose.
Its only the internet, not a resume. But I would have to agree that mispellings and poor grammar do reflect the reader's opinion of the writer.
I had a physics teacher in college who was absolutely brilliant, but he couldn't spell his way of a cardboard box.......
And it's could have NOT could of
A couple I notice regularly.....
The word etcetera is abbreviated with etc, not ect.
Voila is not walla.....
Its probably, not prolly.
I do admit to throwing in a gonna or dunno but it is done on purpose.
Its only the internet, not a resume. But I would have to agree that mispellings and poor grammar do reflect the reader's opinion of the writer.
I had a physics teacher in college who was absolutely brilliant, but he couldn't spell his way of a cardboard box.......
And it's could have NOT could of
And it's could have, not could have. Capiltalizing in the middle of a sentence is also wrong. Now find my error.
There
Their
They're