Reply With QuoteWhere is it going to go and what are you mostley going to be watching on it?,you know, DVD's, HD, NTSC programs? Oh, and I would past with that response time.
Does this look like a good deal?
http://www.microcenter.com/single_pr...duct_id=227483
Where is it going to go and what are you mostley going to be watching on it?,you know, DVD's, HD, NTSC programs? Oh, and I would past with that response time.
Where is it going to go and what are you mostley going to be watching on it?,you know, DVD's, HD, NTSC programs?
Hell I don't know. It'll probably go in my room until I finally get a house. Probably mostly watch tv (digital cable) and DVD's.
If you have 20/20 vision or better, you won't like the picture quality. I suggest you go and check it out in person, there is a Micro Center in Tustin, of Edinger and the 55FWY. I use to work there, brings back memories.
If you have 20/20 vision or better, you won't like the picture quality. I suggest you go and check it out in person, there is a Micro Center in Tustin, of Edinger and the 55FWY. I use to work there, brings back memories.
20/12.
If I remember right it needs to be at least 8 - 12 ms, obviously the lower the better, to avoid excess blurring. Some of the new monitors coming out are as low as 3-4 ms (mostly comp monitors). But fast response times aren't going to help picture quality, and the only way they can keep prices that low is to bring picture quality down with it. ryruiz is right, go look at it and if you can live with the pic quality thats a big TV for the money. Make sure you view it with whatever source you are going to use it with the most. If you dont mind stepping down to a 32" the best quality for the money I have found is the Westinghouse. If you look around and aren't in a hurry you can pick one up for about that price.
If I remember right it needs to be at least 8 - 12 ms, obviously the lower the better, to avoid excess blurring. Some of the new monitors coming out are as low as 3-4 ms (mostly comp monitors). But fast response times aren't going to help picture quality, and the only way they can keep prices that low is to bring picture quality down with it. ryruiz is right, go look at it and if you can live with the pic quality thats a big TV for the money. Make sure you view it with whatever source you are going to use it with the most. If you dont mind stepping down to a 32" the best quality for the money I have found is the Westinghouse. If you look around and aren't in a hurry you can pick one up for about that price.
It was just an idea. A buddy of mine sent me the link and I was just curious on the quality. I'm kinda holding out to get one of these. :rollside:
http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTE...atpanel_46to52
I am not a big fan of the LCD technology when used as a TV, because they suffer from the the Screen Door Effect, Any TV that uses a technology with a significant gap between pixels will suffer from the Screen Door Effect.
I am not a big fan of the LCD technology when used as a TV, because they suffer from the the Screen Door Effect, Any TV that uses a technology with a significant gap between pixels will suffer from the Screen Door Effect.
SOunds like a bunch of technical mumbo jumbo to me. My buddy has this tv and it looks awesome to me. :rollside:
SOunds like a bunch of technical mumbo jumbo to me. My buddy has this tv and it looks awesome to me. :rollside:
Hey, you are the only one who has to be happy with the TV, after all, you are the one who is going to be watching it. Ignore everything and go get it, quit wasting our time and asking us what we think.
Posting Permissions