No need, I can take the subtle hint with your jabs. It's just too bad because stimulating conversations do get people involved.
Willis go break the record, carry on.
okay ... I'll play ... let's review:
How do you plan on breaking the record which is 7.62 @ 147.03 MPH when you have an open cockpit boat that is limited to 145 MPH? Your best run from the last race was 8.8 @ 116
Ouch ... not nice
I also don't think that you will be turning that screwcharger fast enough to really see any benefits anyhow
hmmm ... you already know his tune up ... and intentions ...
you had a superchiller and you weren't turning that small roots at a high overdrive
Um ... he ran a 1071 and 1471 ... not small roots IMO
So what your saying is to take an engine built for 10 lbs of boost then throw 40+ lbs of boost at it and run the number.
How do you know what his engine was built for? And to bag on his motor isn't cool IMO.
You say he had it turned down for the last race, funny, because that was the fastest time posted for the entire year.
and you say you're not baggin'?
He may have the best parts money can buy for 10 lbs of boost, but they weren't designed for 40+ lbs of boost.
Here you go again ... and you say you weren't capping on Willis' program ...
I would just like to see more facts backing up this incredible statement.
I'm not sure he'll answer you with all of (what we call) the negitive comments you've posted.
Where is there negativity
Above in your quotes and there are more to follow:
Just because someone wants to talk about lofty goals
I don't think he has lofty goals ... I think they are admirable.
I don't see where he plans on making up over a full second of ET
He's starting by taking a prooven equation ... and trying to make it happen.
I guess we all should have a drink of the grape kool aid and be done with it. Why is it that most take the path of least resistance and follow the crowd of complacency.
I like this one ...
To wrap it up ... I agree that a stimulating conversation is great ... but the subtle jabs were provoked by you ... now, I am not in Willis' corner, nor am I in yours ... but is someone came out and were slamming your program, wouldn't you take a little offense? Willis is trying and you did have a little bit of negativity in the things you were typing ... maybe a different approach would have been appropriate ... like, "Hey Willis, did you have to beef up your bottom end to support that PSI?" Instead of the tone of, "Hey Willis, was a piece before ... why do you think it's gonna support the new PSI?"
FYI ... If someone came out capping on you like that ... I'd stand in your coner just as fast as I stood in his ...
I hope that that wasn't too subtle ...